Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;30:2. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0158-2

Table 4.

Screening accuracy of pre-bronchodilator lung monitor FEV1/FEV6 cut-points, against post-BD confirmatory spirometry (FEV1/FVC < LLN).

TP FP TN FN Sens (95% CI) Spec (95% CI) PPV (3% prevalence) PPV (6% prevalence) PPV (10% prevalence) Proportion referred to diagnostic testa Proportion of true cases misseda
<0.4 6 0 207 331 1.79 (0.7, 3.8) 100 (98.2, 100) 1.1% 98.2%
<0.5 34 0 207 303 10.1 (7.1, 13.8) 100 (98.2, 100) 6.3% 89.9%
<0.6 88 1 206 249 26.1 (21.5, 31.1) 99.5 (97.3, 100) 0.63 (0.19, 0.92) 0.78 (0.33, 0.96) 0.86 (0.46, 0.98) 16.4% 73.9%
<0.7 197 3 204 140 58.5 (53.0, 63.8) 98.6 (95.8, 99.7) 0.56 (0.39, 0.70) 0.72 (0.57, 0.83) 0.82 (0.70, 0.90) 36.8% 41.5%
<0.71 207 4 203 130 61.4 (56.0, 66.6) 98.1 (95.1, 99.5) 0.50 (0.38, 0.61) 0.67 (0.56, 0.77) 0.78 (0.69, 0.85) 38.8% 38.6%
<0.72 220 7 200 117 65.3 (59.9, 70.4) 96.6 (93.2, 98.6) 0.37 (0.31, 0.44) 0.55 (0.48, 0.62) 0.68 (0.62, 0.74) 41.7% 34.7%
<0.73 234 9 198 103 69.4 (64.2, 74.3) 95.7 (91.9, 98.0) 0.33 (0.29, 0.38) 0.50 (0.45, 0.56) 0.64 (0.59, 0.69) 44.7% 30.6%
<0.74 244 12 195 93 72.4 (67.3, 77.1) 94.2 (90.1, 97.0) 0.28 (0.25, 0.31) 0.44 (0.41, 0.48) 0.58 (0.54, 0.62) 47.1% 27.6%
<0.75 253 17 190 84 75.1 (70.1, 79.6) 91.8 (87.2, 95.1) 0.22 (0.20, 0.24) 0.37 (0.34, 0.39) 0.50 (0.48, 0.53) 49.6% 24.9%
<0.76 264 25 182 73 78.3 (73.6, 82.6) 87.9 (82.7, 92.0) 0.17 (0.16, 0.18) 0.29 (0.28, 0.31) 0.42 (0.40, 0.44) 53.1% 21.7%
<0.77 273 29 178 64 81.0 (76.4, 85.1) 86.0 (80.5, 90.4) 0.15 (0.14, 0.16) 0.27 (0.26, 0.28) 0.39 (0.38, 0.41) 55.5% 19.0%
<0.78 279 31 176 58 82.8 (78.3, 86.7) 85.0 (79.4, 89.6) 0.15 (0.14, 0.15) 0.26 (0.25, 0.27) 0.38 (0.37, 0.39) 57.0% 17.2%
<0.79 287 41 166 50 85.2 (80.9, 88.8) 80.2 (74.1, 85.4) 0.12 (0.11, 0.12) 0.22 (0.21, 0.22) 0.32 (0.31, 0.33) 60.3% 14.8%
<0.8 295 48 159 42 87.5 (83.5, 90.9) 76.8 (70.5, 82.4) 0.10 (0.10, 0.11) 0.19 (0.19, 0.20) 0.30 (0.29, 0.30) 63.1% 12.5%
<0.9 333 182 25 4 98.8 (97.0, 99.7) 12.1 (8.0, 17.3) 0.03 (0.03, 0.03) 0.07 (0.07, 0.07) 0.11 (0.11, 0.11) 94.7% 1.2%

TP true positives, FP false positives, TN true negatives, FN false negatives, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, PPV positive predictive value

aAssuming 6% COPD prevalence