Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 7;162(1):43–54. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04055-4

Table 3.

Clinical parameters and outcomes of vestibular schwannoma surgery before and after treatment paradigm change with the introduction of Cyber Knife (CK) radiosurgery

Before CK (n = 73)
2001–2012
After CK (n = 22)
2013–2017
Age (mean ± sd) 53 ± 14 years 52 ± 16 years
Gender (male/female) 30/43 7/15
Diameter (mean ± sd) 25 ± 14 mm 31 ± 9 mm p < 0.05
Volume (mean ± sd) 10,400 ± 12,100 mm3 14,100 ± 11,400 mm3 p < 0.05
Size1
  Intrameatal 6.6% (n = 4)
  Small 11.5% (n = 7)
  Medium 50.8% (n = 31) 54.5% (n = 12)
  Large 31.1% (n = 19) 45.5% (n = 10)
Koos grade (mean ± sd (range))2 3.32 ± 0.81 (1–4) 3.95 ± 0.21 (3–4)
Extent of resection p < 0.01
  Gross total 36.1% (n = 26) 9.1% (n = 2)
  Near total 47.2% (n = 34) 90.9% (n = 20)
  Subtotal 13.9% (n = 10)
  Partial 2.8% (n = 2)
Drilling3 58.3% (n = 42) 9.1% (n = 2) p < 0.001
Complication4 15.1% (n = 11) 4.5% (n = 1)
Regrowth5 24.7% (n = 18) 19.8% (n = 4)
Facial nerve outcome6 p < 0.05
  Good 65.2% (n = 43) 68.4% (n = 13)
  Moderate 12.1% (n = 8) 31.6% (n = 6)
  Poor 22.8% (n = 15)
Hearing class (mean ± SD) 7
  Preoperative 2.5 ± 1.2 2.6 ± 1.5
  Postoperative 4.2 ± 1.3 4.3 ± 0.9
  Change 1.7 ± 1.4 2.0 ± 1.5

Significant differences have been indicated according to the Mann-Whintey U and chi square test

1Size is determined according to largest diameter (small ≤ 15 mm < medium ≤ 30 mm < large)

2Koos grading of vestibular schwannoma: 1, intarmeatal; 2, extending to the cerebellopontine angle; 3, in contact with the brainstem; 4, compressing the brainstem

3Drilling in internal acoustic meatus

4Complication requiring re-operation

5Regrowth leading to reoperation or radiosurgery

6Facial nerve outcome at 12 months by House-Brackman grade (1–2 good, 3–4 moderate, 5–6 poor)

7Hearing is determined according to the WHO classification