Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Aug 10;39(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.07.007

Table 4.

Cox proportional hazard regression estimating the relationship of log of endothelin-1 level at the baseline exam with clinical outcomes (n=1,361)

Hazard Ratio per log increase in endothelin-1 level (95% CI) p-value
Hazard of heart failure or cardiovascular death
 Unadjusted 0.09 (0.01, 0.73) 0.03
 Limited model* 0.06 (0.00, 1.03) 0.05
 Full Model 0.07 (0.00, 1.30) 0.08
Hazard of heart failure
 Unadjusted 0.04 (0.00, 1.20) 0.06
 Limited model* 0.10 (0.01, 1.90) 0.13
 Full Model 0.14 (0.01, 2.91) 0.20
Hazard cardiovascular death
 Unadjusted 0.02 (0.00, 2.09) 0.10
 Limited model* 0.06 (0.00, 3.01) 0.16
 Full Model 0.07 (0.00, 3.21) 0.17
Hazard of non-cardiovascular death
 Unadjusted 0.37 (0.02, 6.54) 0.50
 Limited model* 0.60 (0.07, 5.09) 0.64
 Full Model 0.76 (0.08, 6.83) 0.80

Definition of abbreviations: CI-confidence interval

Because initial models suggested a non-proportional hazard, all models accounted included a term accounting for the possibility of a time-varying relationship between endothelin-1 and the hazard of heart failure or death. Three influential endothelin-1 outliers were excluded from the primary analysis. Inclusion of these outlier strengthened the association with mortality

*

Limited model: age, sex, race/ethnicity, height and weight, study site

Full model: Limited + education, smoking status, pack-years, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol