Table 7.
S.No | CVD risk category Baseline | CVD risk at follow up | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<10% | 10–20% | 20–30% | 30–40% | > 40% | |||
1. | Low risk (<10%) | 202 (92.7) | 13 (6) | 2 (0.9) | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 218 (60.6) |
2. | Moderate Risk (10–20%) | 28 (35) | 49 (61.3) | 3 (3.8) | 0 | 0 | 80 (22.2) |
3. | High risk (20–30%) | 16 (36.4) | 20 (45.5) | 6 (13.6) | 1 (2.3) | 1 (2.3) | 44 (12.2) |
4. | Very high risk (30–40%) | 5 (55.6) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 0 | 9 (2.5) |
5. | Very high risk (>40%) | 1 (11.1) | 6 (66.7) | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) | 0 | 9 (2.5) |
Total | 252 (70) | 90 (25) | 13 (3.6) | 4 (1.1) | 1 (0.3) | 360 |
Mc Nemar <.01
Majority of the subjects (92.7%) in the low risk category remained in the same risk category at 1 year follow up. Among subjects in the moderate risk category nearly two third (61.3%) remained in the same category, however approximately one third (35%) moved to the low risk category. In the high risk group 36.4% subjects shifted risk down two categories, from high to low and 45.5% subjects shifted one category from high to moderate. There were significantly higher proportion of participants in the low risk category and lower proportion in high risk category at 1 year follow up in comparison to baseline assessment.(Mc Nemar <.01)