Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2019 Sep 19;76(1):304–315. doi: 10.1111/biom.13116

Table 2.

Selection percentage for the optimal treatment regime (OTR) within each subgroup, and mean trial durations, for the four designs under the eight scenarios in Table 1. The accrual rate is 6 patients per month.

Selection percentage of OTR
Trial duration (in months)
Subgroup 1 Subgroup 2
Scenario TD ITD TDC TDU TD ITD TDC TDU TD ITD TDC TDU
1 88.1 75.4 89.4 88.6 85.0 69.4 89.5 88.8 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0
2 69.2 58.7 72.4 72.1 67.1 56.2 69.0 70.9 23.1 26.0 360.0 23.0
3 73.7 64.0 74.1 74.7 73.5 62.2 72.6 75.9 23.0 25.9 360.0 23.0
4 60.9 46.1 63.4 47.9 78.4 66.0 79.7 78.0 23.1 26.0 360.0 23.0
5 72.9 70.0 78.9 75.8 85.9 79.0 87.5 86.9 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0
6 79.8 74.4 78.0 72.9 48.0 59.8 50.8 45.0 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0
7 82.5 80.9 83.9 72.4 95.6 93.1 96.7 95.3 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0
8 47.2 35.2 50.9 38.1 65.6 58.6 68.0 54.0 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0
Average 71.8 63.1 73.9 67.8 74.9 68.0 75.6 74.4 23.0 26.0 360.0 23.0

“TD” is the proposed two-stage trial design; “TDC” denotes the two-stage trial design based on complete (YT, YE) data; “TDU” denotes the two-stage trial design based on AR probabilities ωc(d,s); “ITD” denotes the independent two-stage design that conducts a separate regime-finding trial for each subgroup.