Table 10.
The influence of lesion location on the depth of invasion diagnosed by EUS.
| ID | Diagnostic accuracy of different lesion locations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper third | Middle third | Lower third | P value | ||||
| Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | ||
| Mandai and Yasuda [33] | 40/52 (76.9%) | 23.1% | 32/45 (71.1%) | 28.9% | 231/309 (74.7%) | 25.3% | =0.802 |
| Kim et al. [12] | 6/8 (75%) | 25% | 54/68 (79.4%) | 20.6% | 82/100 (82%) | 18% | =0.803 |
| Hizawa et al. [30] | 20/32 (63%) | 37% | 80/105 (76%) | 24% | 79/92 (86%) | 14% | =0.019 |
| Kim et al. [9] | 17/24 (70.8%) | 29.2% | 58/90 (64.4%) | 35.6% | 73/92 (77%) | 23% | =0.082 |
| Kim et al. [29] | 32/39 (82.1%) | 17.9% | 65/75 (86.7%) | 13.3% | 132/159 (83.0%) | 17% | =0.344 |
| Kim et al. [16] | 24/34 (70.6%) | 29.4% | 135/159 (85%) | 15% | 129/152 (84.7%) | 15.3% | =0.034 |
| Cheng et al. [31] | 22/30 (73.3%) | 26.7% | 29/46 (63.0%) | 37% | 87/129 (62.6%) | 37.4% | =0.650 |
| Choi et al. [23] | 17/29 (58.6%) | 41.4% | 43/57 (75.4%) | 24.6% | 246/302 (81.5%) | 18.5% | =0.013 |
| Okada et al. [7] | 107/139 (77%) | 23% | 115/134 (85.8%) | 14.2% | 222/269 (82.5%) | 17.5% | =0.160 |
| Watari et al. [32] | 42/45 (93.3%) | 6.7% | 61/69 (88.4%) | 11.6% | 29/39 (74.4%) | 25.6% | =0.030 |
| Total | 327/432 (75.7%) | 24.3% | 672/848 (79.2%) | 20.8% | 1310/1643 (79.7%) | 20.3% | =0.181 |