Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 23;2019:8536785. doi: 10.1155/2019/8536785

Table 1.

Basic demographics and clinical characteristics of each included study.

Authors Sample size, n Follow-up, month Age, year EDSS MS subtype, % MS duration, year Cell source Transplantation way
Bonab et al. 10 19 (13-26) 33 (22-40) 5.15 (3.5-6) SPMS (80%) PPMS (20%) 11.2 (3-21) Bone marrow Intrathecal injection

Karussis et al. 15 6 35.3 ± 8.6 6.7 (4-8) NA 10.7 (5-15) Bone marrow Intrathecal and intravenous injection

Yamout et al. 7 12 42 (34-49) 6.5 (4.5-7.5) SPMS (100%) 19.9 (11-39) Bone marrow Intrathecal injection

Bonab et al. 22 12 35.2 (23-50) 6.2 (5.5-7) SPMS (91%) PRMS (9%) 8.68 (5-14) Bone marrow Intrathecal injection

Connick et al. 10 12 48.8 (40–53) 6.1 (5.5–6.5) SPMS (100%) 14.4 (5–26) Bone marrow Intravenous injection

Harris et al. 6 88.8 (48-96) 43 (28-64) 7.3 (6.5-9) SPMS (67%) PPMS (33%) 17 (7-27) Bone marrow Intrathecal injection

Cohen et al. 6 12 46.4 ± 5.2 6 (3–6.5) SPMS (58%) RRMS (42%) 15.4 ± 9 Bone marrow Intravenous injection

Fernández et al. 19 12 46.3 ± 8.85 7.64 ± 0.575 SPMS (100%) 17.05 ± 7.4 Adipose Intravenous injection

Harris et al. 20 12 49 (27-65) 6.8 (3.5-8.5) SPMS (80%) PPMS (20%) 18.8 (10-32) Bone marrow Intrathecal injection