Table 3. Assessment of study quality using modified NOS with respect to fundal images.
Paper | Sample size | Validation technique | Unique database | Definition of glaucoma | CI | AUROC | Total |
Nayak et al 2009[42] | X | 1 | |||||
Bock et al 2010[51] | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |
Acharya et al 2011[43] | X | 1 | |||||
Mookiah et al 2012[44] | X | X | 2 | ||||
Chakrabarty et al 2016[41] | X | X | X | X | 4 | ||
Issac et al 2015[45] | X | 1 | |||||
Maheshwari et al 2017[46] | X | X | 2 | ||||
Singh et al 2016[47] | X | 1 | |||||
Maheshwari et al 2017[48] | X | X | 2 | ||||
Raghavendra et al 2018[49] | X | 1 | |||||
Ahn et al 2018[63] | X | X | X | X | 4 | ||
Christopher et al 2018[52] | X | X | X | X | X | 5 | |
Li et al 2018[53] | X | X | X | X | 4 |
CI: Confidence interval; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; OCT: Ocular coherence tomography.