Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 18;13(1):149–162. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.01.22

Table 6. Meta-analysis and AUROC of studies relating to OCT studies.

Study AUROC SE 95%CI z P Weight (%)
Fixed Random
Burgansky-Eliash et al 2005[54] 0.981 0.0330 0.916 to 1.000 2.12 8.69
Bowd at al 2008[55] 0.817 0.0300 0.758 to 0.876 2.56 9.19
Bizios et al 2010[62] 0.977 0.0102 0.957 to 0.997 22.16 12.12
Barella et al 2013[60] 0.877 0.0342 0.810 to 0.944 1.97 8.49
Silva et al 2013[61] 0.807 0.0395 0.730 to 0.884 1.48 7.64
Xu et al 2013[56] 0.903 0.0472 0.810 to 0.996 1.04 6.54
Muhammad et al 2017[57] 0.945 0.0102 0.925 to 0.965 22.16 12.12
Asaoka et al 2019[59] 0.937 0.0158 0.906 to 0.968 9.22 11.45
Christopher et al 2018[58] 0.950 0.0153 0.920 to 0.980 9.85 11.52
An et al 2019[50] 0.963 0.00917 0.945 to 0.981 27.44 12.22
Total (random effects) 0.923 0.0174 0.889 to 0.957 53.1 <0.001 100.00 100.00

OCT: Ocular coherence tomography; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: Confidence interval; SE: Standard error.