Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 17;9(1):215–224. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2704

Table 2.

Median survival and hazard ratio of baseline composite ESAS scores

  Median survival, mo (95% CI) Crude hazard ratio (95% CI)
High symptom burden Low symptom burden
Total cohort (n = 2034)
TSDS 4.64 (3.95, 5.20) 7.46 (7.07, 8.06) 1.54 (1.39, 1.70)*
PHS 4.14 (3.68, 4.80) 7.60 (7.13, 8.12) 1.64 (1.48, 1.81)*
PSS 5.56 (5.10, 6.08) 7.10 (6.71, 7.60) 1.23 (1.11, 1.36)*
Gemcitabine (n = 1103)
TSDS 3.66 (3.32, 4.21) 6.81 (6.21, 7.27) 1.57 (1.37, 1.78)*
PHS 3.37 (2.80, 3.81) 6.94 (6.35, 7.53) 1.71 (1.50, 1.95)*
PSS 4.95 (3.95, 5.56) 6.21 (5.49, 6.71) 1.20 (1.05, 1.37)*
Gemcitabine+nab‐paclitaxel (n = 131)
TSDS 4.37 (2.00, 5.92) 6.18 (4.60, 7.30) 1.30 (0.86, 1.95)
PHS 3.65 (1.58, 5.92) 6.18 (4.67, 7.30) 1.28 (0.85, 1.93)
PSS 4.70 (3.26, 6.15) 6.15 (4.41, 7.43) 1.36 (0.92, 2.02)
FOLFIRINOX (n = 809)
TSDS 6.12 (5.23, 7.04) 8.84 (8.19, 9.63) 1.44 (1.21, 1.72)*
PHS 6.31 (5.26, 7.20) 8.81 (8.19, 9.63) 1.51 (1.27, 1.81)*
PSS 6.97 (5.98, 7.96) 8.52 (7.86, 9.50) 1.25 (1.05, 1.48)*

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; TSDS, baseline total symptom distress score; PHS, baseline physical symptom scores; PSS, baseline psychological symptom scores.

*

P < .05.