Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):7656–7659.

Table 5.

Correlation between TREM-1 with DAP-12, TLR2, TLR4, HMGB-1 and RAGE in omentum, subcutaneous and liver tissues of study subjects

Target genes correlation Obese non-diabetics (OND) Obese diabetics (OD) Correlation (R); P value
Increased TREM-1 (OND-21/23; OD-18/18) association with other genes in omentum biopsy samples
    DAP-12 19/21 (90.5%) 18/18 (100%) NS
    HMGB1 17/21(81.0%) 18/18 (100%) NS
    RAGE 15/21 (71.4%) 18/18 (100%) NS
    TLR-4 21/21 (100%) 18/18 (100%) NS
    TLR-2 19/21 (90.5%) 18/18 (100%) NS
Increased TREM-1 (OND-13/23; OD-13/18) association with other genes in subcutaneous biopsy samples
    DAP-12 9/13 (69.2%) 13/13 (100%)* R = 0.426; P = 0.048
    HMGB1 9/13 (69.2%) 12/13 (92.3%) NS
    RAGE 8/13 (61.5%) 9/13 (69.2%) NS
    TLR-4 13/13 (100%) 13/13 (100%) NS
    TLR-2 9/13 (69.2%) 12/13 (92.3%) NS
Increased TREM-1 (OND-12/23; OD-18/18) association with other genes in liver samples
    DAP-12 12/12 (100%) 18/18 (100%) NS
    HMGB1 7/12 (58.3%) 18/18 (100%)** R = 0.548; P = 0.006
    RAGE 5/12 (41.7%) 13/18 (72.2%)* R = 0.356; P = 0.045
    TLR-4 7/12 (58.3%) 18/18 (100% )** R = 0.548; P = 0.006
    TLR-2 6/12 (50%) 18/18 (100%)*** R = 0.612; P = 0.002

Subject’s categorical variables with correlation between TREM-1 and DAP-12, TLR2, TLR4, HMGB-1 and RAGE were analyzed among obese non-diabetics and obese diabetics using Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s χ2 test. Data show number of subjects having higher values of these compared to control non-obese subjects. Values show number of subjects (% subjects of total), not significant (NS).

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P < 0.001.