Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec 31;88:420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.022

Table 4.

Results from Sibling-Comparison Models Testing for Genetic Confounding

Physical Health Problemsa Depressive Symptomsa Educational Attainmentb Income Attainmentb Alcohol Problemsc Antisocial Behaviord
MIDUS
Main Effects
  Between-Family Effect .23 .44* −2.01** .43 .60 1.00**
(−.24 to .71) (.06 to .83) (−2.78 to −1.24) (−.33 to 1.19) (−.12 to 1.32) (.45 to 1.55)
  Within-Family Effect .17 2.50* −2.53 .77 1.27 −.58
(−1.39 to 1.73) (.59 to 4.41) (−10.16 to 5.11) (−3.95 to 5.49) (−1.91 to 4.46) (−2.84 to 1.68)
  Zygosity .29* −.14 −.89** −.32 −.25 .05
(.03 to .56) (−.36 to .08) (−1.12 to −.65) (−.96 to .32) (−.89 to .39) (−.24 to .33)
Interaction Effects
  Zygosity × Within-Family Effect −.53 −1.30* .45 .14 −.28 1.21
(−1.69 to .62) (−2.46 to −.14) (−3.93 to 4.84) (−3.01 to 3.28) (−2.48 to 1.91) (−.26 to 2.69)
Add Health
Main Effects
  Between-Family Effect .13** .36* −.88** −.67** −.01 .61**
(.06 to .21) (.10 to .62) (−1.14 to −.61) (−.92 to −.43) (−.09 to .07) (.41 to .81)
  Within-Family Effect .10 .38 −.35 −.09 .11 −.29
(−.13 to .33) (−.43 to 1.19) (−1.07 to .38) (−.84 to .67) (−.33 to .55) (−.91 to .33)
  Zygosity .03 −.17* −.11 −.16* .04 .02
(−.01 to .07) (−.29 to −.04) (−.20 to −.01) (−.29 −.03) (.00 to .07) (−.12 to .16)
Interaction Effects
  Zygosity × Within-Family Effect −.02 .06 .03 −.08 −.01 .17
(−.11 to .08) (−.24 to .36) (−.92 to −.43) (−.33 to .18) (−.16 to .15) (−.07 to .40)

Note: All models account for nested family structure of both samples.

Unstandardized regression coefficients presented with accompanying 95% confidence intervals presented in parentheses.

Models estimated using the MIDUS data include the following covariates: diet to control weight; smoked cigarettes in the past week; daily stressful experiences; verbal ability (BTACT); age; sex; and race. Models estimated using the Add Health data include the following covariates: physical activity in the past week; fast food consumption in the past week; smoked cigarettes in the past week; daily stressful experiences (perceived stress scale); verbal ability (Picture Vocabulary Test); age; sex; and race.

Missing values were handled using full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation for all estimated multivariate models.

Between-family effects provide an estimation of the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and each outcome across families. Within-family effects reflect differences in the same association between siblings from the same family.

A significant multiplicative interaction term between zygosity and the within-family effect would provide evidence of genetic confounding, while a nonsignificant interaction term would provide evidence of familial confounding.

a

Model estimated using a multilevel linear regression model.

b

Model estimated using a multilevel logistic regression model.

c

Model estimated using multilevel negative binomial regression model.

d

Model estimated using a multilevel linear regression model for the MIDUS sample and a multilevel negative binomial model for the Add Health sample.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .001