Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;27:20. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0604-z

Table 3.

Correlation between clinical parameters and ratios of different CD4+ subpopulations. A comparison of different CD4+ subsets ratios was performed with total and nadir CD4 + T cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio and viral load. Number of values (n), Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r), and p value are indicated

Clinical parameter Th1/
FoxP3
Th1/
Tregs
Th1/
uTregs
Th1/
Th17
Th17/
FoxP3
Th17/
Tregs
Th17/
uTregs
CD4 + T cell count (cell/ml) n = 15 n = 14 n = 15 n = 14 n = 13 n = 13 n = 13
r = 0.59 r = 0.70 r = 0.55 r = 0.055 r = 0.57 r = 0.65 r = 0.24
p = 0.011 p = 0.0026 p = 0.018 p = 0.43 p = 0.024 p = 0.18 p = 0.44
Nadir CD4 T cell count (cell/ml) n = 15 n = 14 n = 15 n = 14 n = 14 n = 14 n = 14
r = 0.60 r = 0.66 r = 0.36 r = 0.37 r = 0.56 r = 0.48 r = 0.20
p = 0.025 p = 0.018 p = 0.14 p = 0.15 p = 0.048 p = 0.16 p = 0.58
CD4/CD8 T cell ratio n = 15 n = 14 n = 15 n = 14 n = 13 n = 13 n = 13
r = 0.25 r = 0.49 r = 0.20 r = 0.23 r = 0.22 r = 0.33 r = 0.14
p = 0.19 p = 0.036 p = 0.23 p = 0.21 p = 0.23 p = 0.26 p = 0.65
Viral Load (copies/ml) n = 15 n = 15 n = 15 n = 14 n = 14 n = 14 n = 14
r = −0.37 r = −0.51 r = − 0.38 r = − 0.34 r = − 0.25 r = − 0.28 r = 0.19
p = 0.087 p = 0.027 p = 0.081 p = 0.12 p = 0.19 p = 0.33 p = 0.52