Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;80(1):41–66. doi: 10.1177/0013164419845039

Table 7.

The Behavior of TLI under Missing Data.

Rho N PM CAT = 2
 CAT = 5
C MCAR
 MAR
 C MCAR
 MAR
PD MI PD MI PD MI PD MI
1.0 200 15 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99
25 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.99
50 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.96 — —
500 15 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00
25 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.99
50 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.98 — —
1,000 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00
25 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00
50 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.91 0.99
0.9 200 15 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.98
25 0.99 0.99 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.94 0.97
50 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.84 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.95 — —
500 15 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.95 0.98
25 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.90 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.92 0.98
50 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.87 0.91 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.87 0.97
1,000 15 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99
25 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.92 0.98
50 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.88 0.96 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.85 0.98
0.8 200 15 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.89 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.91 0.95
25 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.85 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.89 0.94
50 0.97 0.98 0.89 0.79 0.83 0.96 0.97 0.92 — —
500 15 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.90 0.95
25 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.86 0.94
50 0.97 0.98 0.93 0.82 0.89 0.95 0.97 0.93 0.78 0.94
1,000 15 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95
25 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.85 0.97 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.86 0.95
50 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.83 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.94 0.78 0.94
0.7 200 15 0.93 0.94 0.91 0.84 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.85 0.90
25 0.93 0.94 0.90 0.80 0.88 0.91 0.92 0.89 0.80 0.88
50 0.93 0.95 0.85 0.74 0.81 0.91 0.93 0.87 0.76 0.85
500 15 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.84 0.89
25 0.93 0.93 0.91 0.80 0.92 0.90 0.91 0.89 0.80 0.89
50 0.93 0.95 0.89 0.77 0.86 0.90 0.93 0.88 0.72 0.88
1,000 15 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.89 0.90 0.89 0.83 0.89
25 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.80 0.94 0.89 0.91 0.89 0.79 0.89
50 0.92 0.94 0.90 0.78 0.92 0.89 0.93 0.89 0.72 0.89
0.6 200 15 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.78 0.86 0.84 0.85 0.83 0.78 0.83
25 0.88 0.89 0.84 0.76 0.82 0.84 0.86 0.82 0.74 0.81
50 0.88 0.91 0.80 0.70 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.80 0.71 0.79
500 15 0.87 0.88 0.86 0.78 0.88 0.83 0.84 0.83 0.77 0.82
25 0.87 0.88 0.86 0.75 0.87 0.83 0.85 0.83 0.73 0.82
50 0.87 0.90 0.83 0.73 0.82 0.83 0.88 0.82 0.66 0.82
1,000 15 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.77 0.88 0.82 0.84 0.82 0.77 0.82
25 0.87 0.88 0.86 0.75 0.89 0.82 0.85 0.82 0.73 0.82
50 0.87 0.90 0.85 0.74 0.88 0.82 0.88 0.82 0.67 0.83

Note. Rho = interfactor correlation; N = sample size; PM = percentage of missingness; C = complete data results; PD = pairwise deletion results; MI = multiple imputation results; CAT = number of categories; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; MCAR = missing completely at random; MAR = missing at random. Conditions with less than 50% of completed replications were excluded from the table.