Table 5.

Comparative performance results among different protein function prediction methods.

Techniques	Sensitivity	Precision	Specificity	Accuracy	MCC	AUC
Traditional GRU*	70.8	44	81	79.2	0.44	0.848
BLSTM	54.2	55.8	90.9	84.6	0.46	0.846
BLAST	54.1	52.8	89.8	83.6	0.43	0.82
New GRU**	79.2	48.7	82.9	82.3	0.52	0.861

(* traditional PSSM profiles + GRU, ** our GRU architecture).