Table 4.
Comparison of alpha diversity index in different groups1.
| Item2 | CON | IDF | SDF | MDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed_species | 629.17 ± 49.21ab | 619.33 ± 21.98b | 727.67 ± 45.12a | 620.5 ± 11.84b |
| Shannon | 6.55 ± 0.17 | 6.55 ± 0.18 | 6.68 ± 0.07 | 6.38 ± 0.13 |
| Simpson | 0.97 ± 0.00 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.00 |
| Chao1 | 671.28 ± 52.31b | 667.92 ± 23.15b | 795.28 ± 61.11a | 664.10 ± 11.54b |
| ACE | 670.84 ± 53.12b | 664.54 ± 22.40b | 788.28 ± 53.55a | 667.43 ± 10.82b |
| Goods_coverage | 0.9983 ± 0.00 | 0.9983 ± 0.00 | 0.9975 ± 0.00 | 0.998 ± 0.00 |
| PD_whole_tree | 39.68 ± 2.77 | 37.25 ± 1.16 | 41.94 ± 1.84 | 39.94 ± 0.74 |
a-bMeans within rows with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). 1Values are presented as means ± SE of six replicates per dietary treatment. 2CON, control; IDF, 1% insoluble fiber; SDF, 1% soluble fiber; MDF, 0.5% insoluble fiber +0.5% soluble fiber.