Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 23;2019:7809171. doi: 10.1155/2019/7809171

Table 4.

Comparison of alpha diversity index in different groups1.

Item2 CON IDF SDF MDF
Observed_species 629.17 ± 49.21ab 619.33 ± 21.98b 727.67 ± 45.12a 620.5 ± 11.84b
Shannon 6.55 ± 0.17 6.55 ± 0.18 6.68 ± 0.07 6.38 ± 0.13
Simpson 0.97 ± 0.00 0.97 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.00
Chao1 671.28 ± 52.31b 667.92 ± 23.15b 795.28 ± 61.11a 664.10 ± 11.54b
ACE 670.84 ± 53.12b 664.54 ± 22.40b 788.28 ± 53.55a 667.43 ± 10.82b
Goods_coverage 0.9983 ± 0.00 0.9983 ± 0.00 0.9975 ± 0.00 0.998 ± 0.00
PD_whole_tree 39.68 ± 2.77 37.25 ± 1.16 41.94 ± 1.84 39.94 ± 0.74

a-bMeans within rows with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). 1Values are presented as means ± SE of six replicates per dietary treatment. 2CON, control; IDF, 1% insoluble fiber; SDF, 1% soluble fiber; MDF, 0.5% insoluble fiber +0.5% soluble fiber.