. 2019 Oct 10;36(4):301–309. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.88752

TABLE 1.

Summary of primary data for association between PPARGC1A Gly482Ser polymorphism and endurance performance.

Authors	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Group	Number (N)	Genotype (N)			MAF	P_HWE	NOS Score
Authors	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Group	Number (N)	Gly/Gly	Gly/Ser	Ser/Ser	MAF	P_HWE	NOS Score
Lucia et al.	2005	Spain	Caucasian	Case Control	104	52	43	9	0.293	1.0000	7
Lucia et al.	2005	Spain	Caucasian	Case Control	100	36	48	16	0.400	1.0000	7
Eynon et al.	2010	Israeli	Caucasian	Case Control	74	37	37	0	0.250	0.9529	7
Eynon et al.	2010	Israeli	Caucasian	Case Control	240	79	117	44	0.427	0.9529	7
Muniesa et al.	2010	Spanish	Caucasian	Case Control	141	65	52	24	0.355	0.2261	7
Muniesa et al.	2010	Spanish	Caucasian	Case Control	123	47	63	13	0.362	0.2261	7
Ginevičienė et al.	2011	Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	77	40	33	4	0.266	0.5177	9
Ginevičienė et al.	2011	Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	250	129	104	17	0.276	0.5177	9
Maciejewska et al.	2012	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	84	46	34	4	0.250	0.8938	8
		Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	684	280	314	90	0.361	0.8938
		Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	548	273	239	36	0.284	0.6651
		Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	1132	489	505	138	0.345	0.6651
He et al.	2015	Chinese	Asian	Case Control	235	73	115	47	0.445	0.6321	7
He et al.	2015	Chinese	Asian	Case Control	504	156	244	104	0.448	0.6321	7
Yvert et al.	2016	Japanese	Asian	Case Control	175	45	87	43	0.494	0.8741	8
Yvert et al.	2016	Japanese	Asian	Case Control	649	191	324	134	0.456	0.8741	8
Peplonska et al.	2017	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	225	102	105	18	0.313	0.0871	6
Peplonska et al.	2017	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	451	199	213	39	0.323	0.0871	6
Guilherme et al.	2018	Brazilian	Caucasian	Case Control	316	153	140	23	0.294	0.6187	7
Guilherme et al.	2018	Brazilian	Caucasian	Case Control	893	428	385	80	0.305	0.6187	7

MAF = minor allele frequency, P _HWE = P value for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium of controls, NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.