. 2019 Oct 10;36(4):301–309. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.88752

TABLE 2.

Summary of primary data for association between PPARGC1A Gly482Ser polymorphism and power performance.

Authors	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Group	Number (N)	Genotype (N)			MAF	P_HWE	NOS Score
Authors	Year	Country	Ethnicity	Group	Number (N)	Gly/Gly	Gly/Ser	Ser/Ser	MAF	P_HWE	NOS Score
Eynon et al.	2010	Israeli	Caucasian	Case Control	81	35	36	10	0.346	0.9529	7
Eynon et al.	2010	Israeli	Caucasian	Case Control	240	79	117	44	0.427	0.9529	7
Ginevičienė et al.	2011	Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	51	29	21	1	0.225	0.5177	9
Ginevičienė et al.	2011	Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	250	129	104	17	0.276	0.5177	9
Maciejewska et al.	2012	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	210	118	79	13	0.25	0.8938	8
		Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	684	280	314	90	0.361	0.8938
		Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	724	329	322	73	0.323	0.6651
		Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	1132	489	505	138	0.345	0.6651
Gineviciene et al.	2016	Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	114	62	35	17	0.303	0.7450	8
		Russian	Caucasian	Case Control	947	424	416	107	0.333	0.7450
		Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	47	24	22	1	0.255	0.4860
		Lithuanian	Caucasian	Case Control	255	132	106	17	0.275	0.4860
Peplonska et al.	2017	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	188	97	73	18	0.290	0.0871	6
Peplonska et al.	2017	Polish	Caucasian	Case Control	451	199	213	39	0.323	0.0871	6
Guilherme et al.	2018	Brazilian	Caucasian	Case Control	314	173	116	25	0.264	0.6187	7
Guilherme et al.	2018	Brazilian	Caucasian	Case Control	893	428	385	80	0.305	0.6187	7

MAF = minor allele frequency, P _HWE = P value for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium of controls, NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.