Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 6;8(12):2160. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122160

Table 1.

Commonalities and differences between randomized controlled trial (RCT) and naturalistic study designs.

Study Design RCT Naturalistic Study Design
Ecological validity Low to medium High
External validity Low to medium High
Internal validity High Low to medium
Criterion validity High High
Construct validity High High
Screening Controlled, per protocol Controlled, per protocol
Inclusion, exclusion criteria Yes Yes
Familiarize with procedures and tests Yes Yes
Drinking session Per protocol, supervised Uncontrolled, not supervised
Instructions Per protocol None, or minimal
Amount, type of drink Pre-set, standardized Self-initiated
Start and stop time of drinking Pre-set, per protocol Self-initiated
Behaviors during drinking Restricted, per protocol Free (as normal)
Drinking environment Research unit Free (e.g., bar(s), at home)
Social aspects of drinking (if not alone) With strangers With friends or strangers
Real time assessments (e.g., BAC) Yes Possible via mobile technology
Food and water intake Restricted, per protocol Free (as normal)
Smoking Restricted, per protocol Free (as normal)
Sleep Controlled and supervised Uncontrolled, not supervised
Time to bed, wake up time Restricted, per protocol Self-initiated
Sleep hygiene and related behaviors Restricted, per protocol Self-initiated
Monitoring, real time assessments Yes Possible via mobile technology
Sleep environment Sleep unit At home or elsewhere
Test days Controlled and standardized Controlled and standardized
Psychometric tests, mood assessments Standardized and validated Standardized and validated
Time of testing Per protocol at pre-set time Per protocol at pre-set time
Conductance of study procedures Per protocol Per protocol
Supervision, monitoring Yes Yes

Description of validity types: Ecological validity = to what extend the study reflects a realistic hangover drinking occasion; external validity = to what extent can findings be generalized to the population as a whole; internal validity = to what extent can the design demonstrate causal effects; criterion validity = to what extent are measures related to study outcomes; construct validity = the degree to which the administered tests measure what they claim or purport to be measuring. Abbreviation: Blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Please note that this table is intended to contrast the RCT and naturalistic study design. Some studies might incorporate features of both designs (e.g., supervised and standardized alcohol administration, but unsupervised sleep at home). Additionally, studies with the same design type may differ significantly in the levels of control, standardization, and quality.