Table 3.

Case-control study of FDCT vs. MDCT patients, n =86.

	MDCT, n = 43	FDCT, n = 43	p-Value
Age median (IQR) *	77 (69–81)	77 (69–82)	0.962
Admission NIHSS *	17 (14–20)	16 (13–20)	0.796
CT ASPECTS *	8 (7–9)	9 (7–10)	0.138
Onset to door, min (IQR; 90th) *	129 (76–200; 244)	160 (74–202; 221)	0.511
Female	26 (61%)	26 (61%)	1.000
IV-rtPA	36 (84%)	30 (70%)	0.201
Hypertension	35 (81%)	33 (77%)	0.791
Hyperlipidemia	14 (33%)	20 (47%)	0.266
PAD	2 (5%)	5 (12%)	0.433
DM	11 (26%)	17 (40%)	0.249
Collateral grading	7 (5–8)	7 (4–8)	0.699
Direct admissions	30 (70%)	18 (42%)	0.016
Working hours	22 (51%)	19 (44%)	0.666
Door to CT, min (IQR; 90th)	15 (11–20; 24)	9 (6–14; 16)	<0.001
Door to IV-rtPA	27 (22–34; 35)	19 (12–22; 34)	0.016
Door to groin	60 (48–68; 79)	25 (19–30; 38)	<0.001
Working hours	60 (42–65; 85)	21 (17–25; 41)	<0.001
Off-hours	62 (53–69; 75)	25 (21–32; 38)	<0.001
Direct admissions	61 (54–67; 83)	26 (25–38; 44)	<0.001
Transfer patients	40 (30–69; 75)	21 (19–26; 35)	<0.001
Groin to reperfusion	42 (27–62; 94)	43 (33–60; 78)	0.866
CT to reperfusion	84 (71–99; 144)	59 (44–75; 96)	<0.001
Door to reperfusion	102 (85–117; 166)	68 (53–89; 104)	<0.001
Working hours	102 (79–145; 191)	62 (52–81; 104)	0.006
Off-hours	103 (93–116; 126)	74 (55–90; 109)	<0.001
Direct admissions	103 (85–121; 184)	72 (58–87; 103)	0.001
Transfer patients	102 (68–109; 120)	64 (51–88; 108)	0.05
ICA-T	7 (16%)	13 (30%)	0.179
M1	26 (61%)	25 (58%)	0.888
M2	9 (21%)	3 (7%)	0.117
Tandem occlusion	6 (14%)	7 (16%)	1
Successful reperfusion (mTICI2b-3)	31 (72%)	38 (88%)	0.102
sICH	3 (7%)	2 (5%)	1
Any hemorrhage	11 (26%)	7 (16%)	0.427
PH–2 hemorrhage	1 (2%)	1 (2%)	1
Discharge mRS	4 (2–5)	3 (1–5)	0.374
90d mRS	4 (1–5)	2 (1–5)	0.153
90d mRS of 0–2	14 (33%)	25 (58%)	0.029
Mortality	9 (21%)	10 (23%)	1

* Matching variables.