Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 24;8(12):2068. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122068

Table 1.

Characteristics of the selected studies.

Study.
1. Year
2. Country
3. Data Collection
Group N Age * (Year) Follow-up * (Month) PSM Overall PSM Base Catheter Removal * (Day) Leakage Retention BNC Continence Outcome
1. Definition
2. Timing of Measurement
Freire, et al. [32] ††
1. 2009
2. USA
3. Prospective
BNP 348 57.1 ± 6.6 12.7 ± 9.7 42 (12.1) 5 (1.4) 7.7 ± 2.44 10 (2.8) 14 (4) 4 (1.1) 1. 0 PPD
2. 4, 12, and 24 months
Control 271 58.9 ± 6.7 26.7 ± 8.0 37 (13.7) 6 (2.2) 8.0 ± 3.97 4 (1.5) 6 (2.2) 2 (0.7)
Friedlander, et al. [33] ††
1. 2012
2. USA
3. Prospective
BNP 791 58.9 ± 6.6 25.8 109 (13.8) 9 (1.1) 7.9 ± 3.5 11 (1.4) NA NA 1. 0 PPD
2. 12, and 24 months
Control 276 58.8 ± 6.8 51.7 38 (13.8) 7 (2.5) 8.0 ± 3.5 11 (4.0) NA NA
Lee, et al. [34]
1. 2014
2. USA
3. Retrospective
BNP 496 59.3 ± 6.7 NA 87 (17.5) 6 (1.2) NA NA NA NA 1. 0 PPD or 0–1 PPD
2. 3 and 12 months
Control 103 60.0 ± 6.5 NA 18 (17.4) 2 (1.9) NA NA NA NA
Rajih, et al. [35]
1. 2018
2. Canada
3. Retrospective
BNP 245 60.6 49 ± 25 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1. 0 PPD
2. 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Control 77 61.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA

BNC, bladder neck contracture; BNP, bladder neck preservation; NA, not available; PPD, pad per day; PSM, positive surgical margin. *: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. : Data are presented as n (%). ††: The data from Freire et al.’s study was a part of Friedlander et al.’s study, therefore only one of the two studies were adopted for meta-analysis depending on the purpose.