Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 12;8(12):2194. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122194

Table 3.

Risk of DM or hyperglycemia in the presence of PA.

Control (N = 816),
PA (N = 286)
Control (N = 699),
PA without SH (N = 245)
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
DM
Model 1 1.61 (1.13–2.30) 0.008 1.56 (1.06–2.31) 0.024
Model 2 1.59 (1.10–2.30) 0.013 1.56 (1.04–2.33) 0.031
Model 3 1.62 (1.10–2.38) 0.014 1.64 (1.08–2.50) 0.020
Model 4 1.63 (1.11–2.39) 0.013 1.65 (1.08–2.51) 0.020
Hyperglycemia
Model 1 2.08 (1.58–2.73) <0.001 2.07 (1.54–2.78) <0.001
Model 2 2.12 (1.59–2.82) <0.001 2.11 (1.55–2.87) <0.001
Model 3 2.08 (1.55–2.79) <0.001 2.06 (1.50–2.83) <0.001
Model 4 2.08 (1.55–2.79) <0.001 2.06 (1.50–2.83) < 0.001

The hyperglycemia was defined as DM or pre-diabetes. Model 1: unadjusted model. Model 2: adjusted for sex, age, and BMI. Model 3: adjusted for current smoking status, alcohol intake (≥3 units/day), and regular outdoor exercise (≥30 min/day), in addition to the variables included in Model 2. Model 4: adjusted for the presence of hypokalemia (K < 3.5 mEq/L), in addition to the variables included in Model 3.