Table 8.

Comparison of tested and calculated corbel results.

Specimen	Corbel Code	${\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{t}} \left(\mathbf{kN}\right)$	${\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{c}} \left(\mathbf{kN}\right)$
			Fattuhi	${\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{t}}/{\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{c}}$	Foster et al.	${\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{t}}/{\mathit{V}}_{\mathit{c}}$
HyFRC	P 1.0	34.0	32.3	1.05	34.5	0.99
	P 0.75	36.5	46.0	0.79	33.8	1.08
	S 1.0	37.5	38.8	0.97	34.5	1.09
	S 0.75	54.0	54.5	0.99	48.0	1.13
ECC	P 1.0	31.5	33.6	0.94	30.5	1.03
	P 0.75	34.0	48.1	0.71	29.8	1.14
	S 1.0	39.0	39.9	0.98	30.5	1.28
	S 0.75	64.0	56.4	1.13	60.0	1.07
SFRC	P 1.0	28.0	31.8	0.88	37.7	0.74
	P 0.75	36.0	45.2	0.80	37.2	0.97
	S 1.0	30.5	38.4	0.80	37.7	0.81
	S 0.75	66.0	53.8	1.23	56.0	1.18

$V_t$ = experimental shear and $V_c$ = calculated shear.