Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2017 Oct 3;113(3):391–404. doi: 10.1111/add.14020

Table 1.

List of studies included in the review and assessment of study methodologies

Article Study design Outcome of interest? Assessed Reason for Use: Cessation? Appropriate study design? Measurement: Exposure precedes outcome? (Timing) Measurement: Assessed Dose of ENDS Use? (Dose) Measurement:
Assessed ENDS Product Type?
Bullen (2013) (57) Randomized controlled trial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
O’Brien (2015) (60) Randomized controlled trial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Caponnetto (2013) (58) Randomized controlled trial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tseng (2016) (61) Randomized controlled trial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vickerman (2017) (101) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Zawertailo (2017) (115) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes Yes Yes No No No
Shi (2016) (116) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes Yes Yes No No No
Adriens (2014) (59) Randomized controlled trial Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Pearson (2015) (81) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes Yes No No No No
Vickerman (2013) (80) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes Yes No No No No
Etter (2014) (63) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Polosa (2015) (70) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
Stein (2016) (105) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
James (2016) (106) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Nolan (2016) (102) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Goniewicz (2013) (84) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Dawkins (2013) (85) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Tackett (2015) (86) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Rutten (2015) (87) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No Yes No
Brown (2014) (91) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
Zhu (2013) (90) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
Allem (2015) (107) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
McQueen (2016) (112) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
Pechacek (2016) (113) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No Yes
Beard (2016) (117) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
Filippidis (2016) (118) Cross-sectional survey Yes Yes No No No No
Caponnetto (2011) (100) Case series Yes Yes No No No Yes
Hatsukami (2017) (123) Randomized controlled trial Yes No Yes No No No
Biener (2014) (72) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Brose (2015) (73) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Al-Delaimy (2015) (78) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Borderud (2014) (75) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Choi (2014) (77) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Grana (2014) (74) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Prochaska (2014) (76) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Hitchman (2015) (79) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes No Yes Yes
Adkison (2013) (82) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes No No No
Polosa (2016) (119) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Manzoli (2016) (120) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Polosa (2016b) (121) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Zhuang (2016) (122) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes No No
Caponnetto (2013) (64) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Nides (2014) (68) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Polosa (2014) (67) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Polosa (2011) (65) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Polosa (2014) (66) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Berg (2014) (62) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes No
Polosa (2016) (103) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes No Yes
Pratt (2016) (104) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Farsalinos (2013b) (89) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes Yes
Siegel (2011) (88) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes Yes
Christensen (2014) (94) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Lee (2014) (93) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Popova (2013) (92) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Wagener (2014) (98) Clinical laboratory study Yes No No Yes No Yes
Manzoli (2015) (83) Longitudinal study with comparison group Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Grace (2015) (69) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes No Yes
Pacifici (2015) (71) Longitudinal study with no comparison group Yes No No Yes No Yes
Fraser (2015) (96) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes Yes
Gallus (2014) (95) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes Yes
Dutra (2014) (114) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Lechner (2015) (97) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes No
Hiscock (2015) (111) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Etter (2016) (110) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
Andler (2016) (108) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No Yes No
Busch (2016) (109) Cross-sectional survey Yes No No No No No
McRobbie (2015) (99) Clinical laboratory study Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
Campagna (2016) (54) Randomized controlled trial No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cibella (2016) (55) Randomized controlled trial No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pulvers (2014) (39) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No Yes No
Pepper (2014) (34) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Pokhrel (2013) (41) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Ramo (2015) (40) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Farsalinos (2013) (33) Cross-sectional survey No No No No Yes No
Pokhrel (2014) (35) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Pokhrel (2014) (36) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Stein (2015) (52) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Beard (2015) (37) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Harrell (2015) (46) Cross-sectional survey No No No No Yes Yes
Kinnunen (2015) (51) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Heydari (2015) (38) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Cho (2016) (49) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Lippert (2016) (48) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
Camenga (2016) (42) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No Yes No
Huerta (2017) (50) Cross-sectional survey No No No No No No
LeVault (2016) (44) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Spears (2016) (45) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Thrul (2017) (43) Cross-sectional survey No Yes No No No No
Jorenby (2017) (56) Clinical laboratory study No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Copp (2015) (47) Clinical laboratory study No No No No No Yes
Silver (2016) (53) Case series No No No No Yes No