Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;10(1 Suppl):84S–91S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219877860

Table 1.

Summary Table of Neurological Outcomes Between Early (≤24 Hours) and late (>24 Hours) Decompression by Neurological Level of Injury (Modified From Wilson JR, Tetreault LA, Kwon BK, et al. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 suppl):95S-115S).

First Author, Year
Study Design
Measure Early (≤24 Hours) Late (>24 Hours) Effect Size
Cervical SCI
Fehlings, 2012 AIS Improvement at 6 n = 131 n = 91 ORadj a:
Prospective cohort study months ≥1 grade improvement 74 (56.5) 45 (49.5) 1.37 (95% CI 0.80 to 2.57), P = .31
≥2 grade improvement 26 (19.8) 8 (8.8) 2.83 (95% CI 1.10 to 7.28), P = .03
Cervical and thoracic and lumbosacral SCI
Dvorak, 2015 AIS Improvement Adjusted estimatesb
Prospective cohort study “Improved score” in AIS A patients n = NR n = NR Beta: 0.068 (95% CI −0.625 to 0.76); P = .848
IRR: 1.07 (95% CI 0.54 to 2.14)
“Improved score” in AIS B, C, and D patients n = NR n = NR Beta: 6.258 (95% CI 0.618 to 11.897); P = .03
IRR: 522.17 (95% CI 1.855 to 146825.5)
Wilson, 2012 AIS improvement (preoperative to acute care discharge [mean 24.8 ± 29.2 days]) n = 33 n = 49 Unadjusted RR
Prospective cohort study ≥1 grade improvement, n (%) 7 (21.2) 9 (18.4) 1.15 (95% CI 0.48 to 2.79), P = .7499
≥ 2 grade improvement, n (%) 3 (9.1) 1 (2.0) 4.45 (95% CI 0.48 to 41.0), P = .2974
AIS improvement (preoperative to inpatient rehabilitation discharge [mean 89.6 ± 47.4 days]) n = 22 n = 33 Unadjusted RR:
≥1 grade AIS improvement, n (%) 9 (40.9) 10 (30.3) 1.33 (95% CI 0.61 to 2.93), P = .4700
≥2 grade AIS improvement, n (%) 6 (27.2) 1 (3.0) 8.9 (95% CI 1.12 to 70.64), P= .0154
AIS Motor Score improvement (mean) 6.2 9.7 P = .18
Multivariate analysis predicting change in AIS Motor Score at rehabilitation discharge NR NR Adjusted effect estimatec = 13.0, P = .01
Thoracolumbar SCI
Rahimi-Movghar, 2014 ASIA Impairment Grade at 12 months n = 16 n = 19 RR:
RCT ≥1 grade improvement, n (%) 5 (31.2) 7 (44) 0.85 (95% CI 0.33 to 2.16)
≥2 grade improvement, n (%) 3 (18.1) 1 (5.2) 3.56 (95% CI 0.41 to 30.99)
Difference in means
Mean change (±SD) from baseline in motor score improvementd 15 (±14.34) 14 (±13.3) 1 (95% CI −8.5 to 10.5, P = .8320)
Wilson, 2018
Retrospective cohort study involving prospective data
Total Motor Score improvement at mean of 8 months n = 25 N = 43 Unadjusted Beta: 7.74 (95% CI: 0.58 to 14.88), P = .03
eAdjusted Beta: 7.01 (95% CI: 1.14-13.03), P = .02
Acute central cord injury without instability
Lenehan, 2010 n = 17 n = 56 ORadj f
Prospective observational study AIS improvement at 6 monthsc NR NR 3.39 (95% CI 0.75 to 15.34), P = .1131
AIS improvement at 12
monthsc
NR NR 2.81 (95% CI 0.48 to 16.60), P= .2548
Total Motor Score improvement at 6 months NR NR Group differencef:
7.47 (95% CI −0.04 to 14.91), P = .0511
Total Motor Score improvement at 12 months NR NR 6.31 (95% CI 0.44 to 12.18), P = .0359

Abbreviations: ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; AIS, ASIA Impairment Score; CI, confidence interval; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; IRR, incidence rate ratio; RR, risk ratio; SCI, spinal cord injury.

aOdds ratio adjusted for preoperative neurological status and steroid administration.

bAuthors reported estimates adjusted for age, injury severity score, and injury type.

cControlling for neurological level of injury and baseline neurological status, an additional 13 points in motor recovery was seen in patients treated within 24 hours of injury compared with those who underwent late decompression.

dAuthors report no improvement in mean AIS motor score for either early or late decompression in patient with complete SCI. In contrast, improvement was observed in both groups in patients with incomplete SCI; data are not provided for comparison between early and late.

eAdjusted for baseline AIS grade and MPSS (methylprednisolone sodium succinate) administration.

fAuthors report that regression with propensity scoring was done to adjust for potential selection bias; however, details were not provided.