Table 3.
Outcome | Variable (ref)* | aOR | (95% CI) | SE | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ate | Education (none) | ||||
Some primary | 1.45 | (0.70–2.99) | 0.81 | 0.7256 | |
Some secondary | 1.12 | (0.37–3.46) | 0.79 | 0.9698 | |
Superior | 0.05 | (0.66–0.05) | 0.75 | 0.0152 | |
Forest visits (< once per week) | |||||
> Once per week | 3.36 | (1.91–5.92) | 0.29 | < 0.0001 | |
Sold/touched | Population (community)† | ||||
Park | 0.23 | (0.19–0.28) | 0.29 | < 0.0001 | |
Education (none) | |||||
Some primary | 1.01 | (0.66–1.55) | 0.36 | 0.0440 | |
Some secondary | 1.37 | (1.01–1.86) | 0.34 | 0.0024 | |
Superior | 0.20 | (0.06–0.62) | 0.65 | 0.1594 |
Bold denotes statistical significance. After adjusting for the level of education in both models, we found that people visiting the forest > 1 time per week were 3.4 times as likely to have recently eaten Gambian rats. Being an employee of the primate sanctuary was protective against selling/touching Gambian rats.
* Reference categories are reported in parentheses.
† The variable “population” refers to whether the participant was a community member or an employee of the primate sanctuary (indicated by “park”).