Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 1;93(1105):20190069. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190069

Table 2. .

Patient examinations: Values of HU and SUV measurements in bright and dark band artifacts in WFBP, MARIS, and iMAR reconstructions. iMAR leads to a significant decrease of HU and SUVmean in bright band artifacts and to a significant increase of HU and SUVmean in dark band artifacts in comparison with WFBP. For MARIS, HU and SUV measurements do not change significantly in comparison with WFBP

bright band dark band
HU WFBP 391.4 ± 293.0 −465.0 ± 241.4
MARIS 344.6 ± 314.7 −370.9 ± 247.5
iMAR 124.6 ± 184.5a −74.3 ± 168.1a
SUVmean WFBP 0.99 ± 0.40 0.72 ± 0.41
MARIS 0.96 ± 0.39 0.74 ± 0.42
iMAR 0.88 ± 0.35a 0.87 ± 0.46a
SUVmax WFBP 1.09 ± 0.43 0.76 ± 0.43
MARIS 1.06 ± 0.42 0.79 ± 0.45
iMAR 0.98 ± 0.39a 0.92 ± 0.49a

HU: Hounsfield Unit; MARIS: metal artifact reduction in image space; SUV: standardized uptake value; WFBP: weighted filtered back projection; iMAR: iterative metal artifact reduction.

a

p<0.017 between WFBP and iMAR