Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;11(24):12568–12580. doi: 10.18632/aging.102588

Table 3. Meta-analysis of PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features in BTC patients.

Tumor type Clinicopathological feature Studies, n Effects model OR (95%CI) P value Heterogeneity
I2(%) p value
eCCA Sex (male vs female) 6 Fixed 1.09(0.69-1.72) 0.710 0 0.826
T stage (T3-T4 vs T1-T2) 4 Fixed 0.80(0.43-1.50) 0.492 0 0.515
N stage (N1 vs N0) 6 Fixed 1.48(0.97-2.27) 0.070 42.3 0.123
Grading (G3 vs G1+G2) 3 Fixed 1.85(0.84-4.07) 0.126 22.2 0.277
iCCA Sex (male vs female) 4 Fixed 1.11(0.71-1.73) 0.651 0 0.931
Tumor size (≥5cm vs <5cm) 2 Random 0.73(0.18-2.98) 0.661 80.3 0.024
N stage (N1 vs N0) 4 Random 1.22(0.15-9.91) 0.852 92.8 <0.001
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 4 Random 3.24(0.75-14.00) 0.116 82.4 0.001
Perineural invasion (yes vs no) 3 Fixed 0.77(0.36-1.72) 0.529 0 0.706
iCCA+eCCA Sex (male vs female) 2 Fixed 1.36(0.77-2.42) 0.290 9.3 0.294
T stage (T3-T4 vs T1-T2) 2 Fixed 1.10(0.63-1.91) 0.741 41.9 0.190
N stage (N1 vs N0) 3 Fixed 1.46(0.85-2.52) 0.174 0 0.586