Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2015 Feb 1;465(3):479–488. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140582

Table 1. Effects of POR deletion in liver or liver and gut on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir, paroxetine and midazolam.

WT and ERL mice were pre-treated with corn oil or 3MC (4 mg/kg, liver POR deletion; 40 mg/kg, gut POR deletion). A single dose of nelfinavir (50 mg/kg), paroxetine (10 mg/kg p.o.) or midazolam (5 mg/kg p.o.) was administered on day 14 after 3MC treatment. Data are means ± S.D.; pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted as described and data compared using a Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005: control compared with liver null; P < 0.05; •• P < 0.01; ••• P < 0.005: control compared with liver and gut null; P < 0.05; liver compared with liver and gut null.

Drug Half-life (min) Cmax (μg/ml) AUCall (min μg/ml) Cl (ml/min/kg)
Nelfinavir
    Control     49 ± 8 0.42 ± 0.48   43 ± 48 2348 ± 1722
    Liver null     51 ± 10   1.4 ± 0.84 142 ± 51   377 ± 116
    Liver and gut null   104 ± 45••   1.8 ± 0.18 339 ± 134   164 ± 91
Paroxetine
    Control   447 ± 136   0.5 ± 0.02 392 ± 51     23 ± 4.7
    Liver null 1565 ± 727 0.56 ± 0.13 578 ± 131    8.3 ± 2.6**
    Liver and gut null   0.5 ± 0.04 594 ± 46••
Midazolam
    Control   109 ± 24 0.61 ± 0.11   43 ± 12   113 ± 35
    Liver null   134 ± 17 1.85 ± 0.34*** 395 ± 141*     13 ± 5**
    Liver and gut null   180 ± 16•◦ 4.46 ± 1.53• ◦ 988 ± 251•••◦    4.3 ± 0.9••◦

Pharmacokinetic data did not reach terminal phase.