Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;8(1):E29–E40. doi: 10.1055/a-1005-6366

Table 1. Summary characteristics of included studies for prevention of post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Author Year, place of study Place of study Type of manuscript Study design Sample size Mean age of treatment group (years) Female gender (%) Primary ERCP indication of bile duct stone (%) Trial-specific treatment details
Rectal NSAID Therapy
Murray et al. 2003 Scotland Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  220 55 65 % 25.45 % Diclofenac 100 mg immediately post-ERCP
Sotoudehmanesh et al. 2007 Iran Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  490 58.4 53.90 % 53.26 % Indomethacin 100 mg immediately pre-ERCP
Otsuka et al. 2012 Japan Full text Multicenter comparator to placebo  104 75 49.04 % 77.88 % Diclofenac 25 – 50 mg immediately pre-ERCP
Elmunzer et al. 2012 United States Full text Multicenter comparator to placebo  602 44.4 79.07 % Indomethacin 100 mg immediately post-ERCP
Dobronte et al. 2012 Hungary Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  228 Indomethacin 100 mg 10 – 15 minutes pre-ERCP
Alabd and Abo 2013 Sudan Abstract Single-center comparator to placebo  240
Dobronte et al. 2014 Hungary Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  665 66.8 Indomethacin 100 mg 10 – 15 minutes pre-ERCP
Andrade-Davila et al. 2015 Mexico Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  166 51.59 66.27 % 39.76 % Indomethacin 100 mg immediately post-ERCP
Patai et al. 2015 Hungary Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  574 66.25 67.16 % 58.63 % Indomethacin 100 mg 60 minutes pre-ERCP
Lua et al. 2015 Malaysia Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  151 50.3 59.03 % 56.25 % Diclofenac 100 mg immediately post-ERCP
Luo et al. 2016 China Full text Multicenter comparator to placebo 2014 62 52.42 % 77.50 % Indomethacin 100 mg 30 minutes pre-ERCP
Levenick et al. 2016 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  449 64.9 52.56 % 27.72 % Indomethacin 50 mg × 2 during ERCP
Ucar et al. 2016 Turkey Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  100 59 66.66 % 83 % Diclofenac 100 mg 30 – 90 minutes pre-ERCP
Aggressive LR solution
Buxbaum et al. 2014 United States Full text Single-center comparator to standard hydration   62 43 51.61 % 74.20 % IV LR solution at a rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 mL/kg immediately post-ERCP, followed by post-ERCP rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h for 8 h
Chuankrekkul et al. 2015 Thailand Abstract Single-center comparator to standard hydration   60 61.9 IV LR solution at a rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 10 mL/kg immediately post-ERCP, followed by post-ERCP rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h for 8 h
Shaygan-Nejad et al. 2015 Iran Full text Single-center comparator to standard hydration  150 49.6 66 % 95.35 % IV LR solution at a rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 mL/kg immediately post-ERCP, followed by post-ERCP rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h for 8 h
Rosa et al. 2016 Portugal Abstract Multicenter comparator to standard hydration   68 IV LR solution at a rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 mL/kg immediately post-ERCP, followed by post-ERCP rate of 3.0 mL/kg/h for 8 h
NCT02050048 2016 United States Multicenter comparator to standard hydration   26 59.1 84.62 % Initial bolus LR solution of 7.58 mL/kg pre-ERCP, IV LR solution of 5.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP, following by post-ERCP bolus of 20 mL/kg for 90 minutes
Chang et al. 2016 Thailand Abstract Single-center comparator to standard hydration  171 50 % IV LR solution at a rate of 150 mL/h starting 2 h pre-ERCP, and continued during and post-ERCP for 24 h
Choi et al. 2016 Korea Full text Multicenter comparator to standard hydration  510 57.6 45.50 % 53.70 % Initial bolus LR solution of 10 mL/kg pre-ERCP, IV LR solution of 3.0 mL/kg/h during ERCP and continued 8 h post-ERCP, following by post-ERCP bolus of 10 mL/kg
Mok et al. 2017 United States Full text Single-center comparator with multiple therapies*   48 60.25 60.60 % Treatment arms included standard normal saline solution vs normal saline plus indomethacin versus LR versus LR plus indomethacin
Rectal NSAIDs + LR solution
Mok et al. 2017 United States Full text Single-center comparator with multiple therapies*   48 60.25 60.60 % Treatment arms included standard normal saline solution vs normal saline plus indomethacin versus LR versus LR plus indomethacin
Pancreatic stent placement
Smithline et al. 1993 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo   99 46 78.79 % 5 – 7 Fr stent, 2 – 2.5 cm in length
Tarnasky et al. 1998 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo   80 46.05 5 – 7 Fr stent, 2 – 2.5 cm in length
Fazel et al. 2003 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo   74 44.7 86.49 % Nasopancreatic 5 Fr catheter or 5 Fr stent, 2 cm length, 2 barbed
Harewood et al. 2005 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo   19 48.75 63.16 % Straight, single flanged, polyethylene 5 Fr stent, 3 – 5 cm length
Sofuni et al. 2011 Japan Full text Multicenter comparator to placebo  201 66.4 37.81 % Straight, 5 Fr stent, 3 cm in length
Pan et al. 2012 China Full text Single-center comparator to placebo   40 58.3 52.50 % Single pigtail, 5 Fr stent
Lee et al. 2012 Korea Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  101 57.5 62.38 % 66.33 % Single pigtail unflanged 3 Fr stent, 4 – 8 cm length
Kawaguchi et al. 2012 Japan Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  120 67 56.67 % 35.83 % Unflanged on pancreatic duct side, 2 flanges on duodenal side 5 Fr stent, 3 cm length
Cha et al. 2013 United States Full text Single-center comparator to placebo  151 56.6 58.94 % 15.89 % Straight or external 3/4 pigtail 5 – 7 Fr stent, 2 – 2.5 cm length

ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; IV, intravenous; LR, lactated ringer’s