Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;10:41. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56840-x

Table 3.

Post-hoc Comparisons for PERSONAL VALENCE * MORAL VALENCE * GAME.

contrast estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
Moral valence: very iniquitous
F,1 - U,1 29.466 4.197 Inf 7.020 <0.0001
F,1 - F,2 −2.693 2.975 Inf −0.905 0.802
F,1 - U,2 13.759 4.69 Inf 2.931 0.0178
U,1 - F,2 −32.160 4.796 Inf −6.705 <0.0001
U,1 - U,2 −15.707 2.651 Inf −5.924 <0.0001
F,2 - U,2 16.453 5.892 Inf 2.792 0.0269
Moral valence: iniquitous
F,1 - U,1 22.953 3.369 Inf 6.813 <0.0001
F,1 - F,2 −1.449 2.975 Inf −0.487 0.9620
F,1 - U,2 11.457 3.677 Inf 3.115 0.0099
U,1 - F,2 −24.402 3.984 Inf −6.124 <0.0001
U,1 - U,2 −11.496 2.651 Inf −4.336 0.0001
F,2 - U,2 12.906 5.035 Inf 2.563 0.0508
Moral valence: slightly iniquitous
F,1 - U,1 19.947 2.928 Inf 6.811 <0.0001
F,1 - F,2 0.857 2.975 Inf 0.288 0.9917
F,1 - U,2 7.689 2.674 Inf 2.875 0.0211
U,1 - F,2 −19.089 3.005 Inf −6.352 <0.0001
U,1 - U,2 −12.257 2.651 Inf −4.623 <0.0001
F,2 - U,2 6.832 3.861 Inf 1.769 0.2881
Moral valence: equitable
F,1 - U,1 8.564 2.510 Inf 3.412 0.0036
F,1 - F,2 0.558 2.975 Inf 0.188 0.9977
F,1 - U,2 4.255 1.747 Inf 2.435 0.0706
U,1 - F,2 −8.005 2.065 Inf −3.877 0.0006
U,1 - U,2 −4.308 0.651 Inf −1.625 0.3644
F,2 - U,2 3.697 0.884 Inf 1.282 0.5744

Post-hoc comparisons for the triple interaction between personal valence * moral valence * game. Comparisons are listed according to moral valence level (very iniquitous, iniquitous, slightly iniquitous, and equitable). Bold grey values indicate comparisons of favorable (F) or unfavorable (U) offers within the same game, whereas bold black values denote comparisons of the economic (1) or pain (2) games within the same valence category. The results are averaged over the level of social valence. P-values were adjusted according to the Tukey method to compare a group of four estimates.