Table 3.
Post-hoc Comparisons for PERSONAL VALENCE * MORAL VALENCE * GAME.
| contrast | estimate | SE | df | z.ratio | p.value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moral valence: very iniquitous | |||||
| F,1 - U,1 | 29.466 | 4.197 | Inf | 7.020 | <0.0001 |
| F,1 - F,2 | −2.693 | 2.975 | Inf | −0.905 | 0.802 |
| F,1 - U,2 | 13.759 | 4.69 | Inf | 2.931 | 0.0178 |
| U,1 - F,2 | −32.160 | 4.796 | Inf | −6.705 | <0.0001 |
| U,1 - U,2 | −15.707 | 2.651 | Inf | −5.924 | <0.0001 |
| F,2 - U,2 | 16.453 | 5.892 | Inf | 2.792 | 0.0269 |
| Moral valence: iniquitous | |||||
| F,1 - U,1 | 22.953 | 3.369 | Inf | 6.813 | <0.0001 |
| F,1 - F,2 | −1.449 | 2.975 | Inf | −0.487 | 0.9620 |
| F,1 - U,2 | 11.457 | 3.677 | Inf | 3.115 | 0.0099 |
| U,1 - F,2 | −24.402 | 3.984 | Inf | −6.124 | <0.0001 |
| U,1 - U,2 | −11.496 | 2.651 | Inf | −4.336 | 0.0001 |
| F,2 - U,2 | 12.906 | 5.035 | Inf | 2.563 | 0.0508 |
| Moral valence: slightly iniquitous | |||||
| F,1 - U,1 | 19.947 | 2.928 | Inf | 6.811 | <0.0001 |
| F,1 - F,2 | 0.857 | 2.975 | Inf | 0.288 | 0.9917 |
| F,1 - U,2 | 7.689 | 2.674 | Inf | 2.875 | 0.0211 |
| U,1 - F,2 | −19.089 | 3.005 | Inf | −6.352 | <0.0001 |
| U,1 - U,2 | −12.257 | 2.651 | Inf | −4.623 | <0.0001 |
| F,2 - U,2 | 6.832 | 3.861 | Inf | 1.769 | 0.2881 |
| Moral valence: equitable | |||||
| F,1 - U,1 | 8.564 | 2.510 | Inf | 3.412 | 0.0036 |
| F,1 - F,2 | 0.558 | 2.975 | Inf | 0.188 | 0.9977 |
| F,1 - U,2 | 4.255 | 1.747 | Inf | 2.435 | 0.0706 |
| U,1 - F,2 | −8.005 | 2.065 | Inf | −3.877 | 0.0006 |
| U,1 - U,2 | −4.308 | 0.651 | Inf | −1.625 | 0.3644 |
| F,2 - U,2 | 3.697 | 0.884 | Inf | 1.282 | 0.5744 |
Post-hoc comparisons for the triple interaction between personal valence * moral valence * game. Comparisons are listed according to moral valence level (very iniquitous, iniquitous, slightly iniquitous, and equitable). Bold grey values indicate comparisons of favorable (F) or unfavorable (U) offers within the same game, whereas bold black values denote comparisons of the economic (1) or pain (2) games within the same valence category. The results are averaged over the level of social valence. P-values were adjusted according to the Tukey method to compare a group of four estimates.