Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;11:130. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13922-8

Table 3.

Performance metrics of the model and eyepacs graders on the secondary clinical validation set.

Metric Model EyePACS Graders
Positive predictive value (%), 95% CI 35% [27–44%] 18% [13–23%]
Negative predictive value (%), 95% CI 96% [95–98%] 95% [94–97%]
Sensitivity (%), 95% CI 57% [47–69%] 55% [43–66%]
Specificity (%), 95% CI 91% [89–93%] 79% [76–82%]
Accuracy (%), 95% CI 88% [86–91%] 77% [74–80%]
Cohen’s Kappa, 95% CI 0.38 [0.29–0.47] 0.17 [0.11–0.24]

For the model we chose an operating point that matched the sensitivity of the eyepacs graders to calculate the metrics. Brackets denote 95% confidence intervals. n = 990 images for all calculations