Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;10:12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55410-5

Table 5.

Comparison of MLE to NFDPM/ACM and nicotine between user groups.

Product User group MLE to NFDPM (mg/session) MLE to ACM (mg/session) MLE to nicotine (mg/session) MLE to NFDPM (mg/day) MLE to ACMa (mg/day) MLE to nicotineb (mg/day)
Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c Mean (±SD) Pr > (t)c
C651 1 19.0 (±7.7) 0.1201 1.55 (±0.63) 0.1195 256.4 (±150.4) 0.1471 20.9 (±12.3) 0.1467
3 16.7 (±7.6) 1.36 (±0.62) 218.2 (±141.9) 17.8 (±11.6)
IS1.0(T) 1 180.1 (±137.8) 0.2735 0.69 (±0.53) 0.2698 1883.1 (±897.6) 0.6693 7.3 (±3.5) 0.6693
2 209.2 (±157.4) 0.80 (±0.60) 1914.2 (±679.4) 7.4 (±2.6)

aMLE to ACM/day was calculated from MLE to nicotine/day using the relationship between ACM and nicotine, determined from calibration smoking (see section 2.4.2).

bFor IS1.0(T), MLE to nicotine per day was calculated by multiplying the average daily consumption e-liquid (mL) per day by the concentration of nicotine (mg/mL) in the cartridge.

cValues > 0.05 indicate no statistically significant difference.