Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2019 Jul 9;57(2):145–154. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1630800

Table 2:

Acceptability of HEART for Teens in Intervention Group in Full Sample and Compared by Gender and Sexual Orientation

Full Sample n = 106 Boys n = 42 Girlsn = 62 Between-Group Comparisona Heterosexual n = 85 Sexual Minorityn = 21 Between-Group Comparison



% (n) % (n) % (n) χ2 p % (n) % (n) χ2 p
Liked Program 83.0 (88) 88.1 (37) 80.6 (50) 1.01 .31 83.5 (71) 81.0 (17) .08 .79
Learned New Things 86.8 (92) 90.5 (38) 85.5 (53) 0.57 .45 89.4 (76) 76.2 (16) 2.57 .11
Program Kept Attention 78.3 (83) 78.6 (33) 79.0 (49) 0.003 .96 76.5 (65) 85.7 (18) .85 .36
Will Use Information in Future 92.5 (98) 95.2 (40) 90.3 (56) 0.85 .36 92.9 (79) 90.5 (19) .15 .70
Useful for Girls My Age 93.4 (99) 97.6 (41) 90.3 (56) 2.12 .15 94.1 (80) 90.5 (19) .36 .55
Useful for Boys My Age 90.6 (96) 95.2 (40) 87.1 (54) 1.91 .17 90.6 (77) 90.5 (19) .00 .99

Note. For each group, the % (n) refers to the number of students who reported “some” or “a lot” to that item. One student did not complete the intervention acceptability survey and was missing from all analyses.

a

Data from the two transgender/gender non-binary students who completed HEART for Teens were removed from the chi-square analyses testing gender differences between boys and girls. These students were included with the full sample data in the first column of this table.