Table 3.
Efficacy of HEART for Teens Intervention at Post-Test
| Intervention | Control | Effects at Post-Testa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | b (SE) | p | Effect Sizeb | |
| Communication Intentions | 4.43 (0.83) | 3.97 (1.15) | 0.55 (0.13) | <.001 | .57 |
| Condom Intentions | 4.38 (1.15) | 3.96 (1.43) | 0.30 (0.13) | .020 | .24 |
| HIV/STD Knowledge | 7.68 (1.79) | 5.74 (1.86) | 1.95 (0.21) | <.001 | 1.27 |
| Condom Attitudes | 3.85 (0.96) | 3.22 (0.94) | 0.50 (0.11) | <.001 | .55 |
| Condom Norms | 3.74 (1.03) | 3.28 (1.13) | 0.44 (0.14) | .001 | .41 |
| Self-Efficacy | 3.30 (0.66) | 3.21 (0.56) | 0.14 (0.06) | .031 | .23 |
| Sexual Assertiveness | 3.88 (0.98) | 3.68 (0.75) | 0.25 (0.11) | .023 | .29 |
Note.
a
Linear regression results, controlling for pre-test level of each variable
b
Cohen’s d standardized difference in covariance adjusted means between treatment group and control group.