Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 1;12(9):3165–3170.

Table 2.

Association of the DRD2 TaqIA polymorphism on PD susceptibility

Analysis model n ORr (95% CI) ORf (95% CI) Ph
A1 vs. A2 Total analysis 13 1.05 (0.97-1.14) 1.05 (0.98-1.13) 0.253
Caucasian 5 1.18 (1.00-1.40) 1.14 (1.02-1.27) 0.221
Asians 8 1.01 (0.92-1.10) 1.01 (0.92-1.10) 0.518
A1A1 vs. A2A2 Total analysis 13 1.08 (0.92-1.26) 1.07 (0.92-1.25) 0.735
Caucasian 5 1.24 (0.92-1.67) 1.24 (0.92-1.67) 0.943
Asians 8 1.02 (0.85-1.23) 1.02 (0.85-1.22) 0.465
A1A1 vs. A1A2 Total analysis 13 1.04 (0.90-1.21) 1.04 (0.90-1.21) 0.876
Caucasian 5 1.09 (0.80-1.48) 1.08 (0.80-1.47) 0.627
Asians 8 1.03 (0.87-1.22) 1.03 (0.86-1.22) 0.776
A1A1 vs. (A2A2 + A1A2) Total analysis 13 1.06 (0.92-1.23) 1.06 (0.92-1.22) 0.850
Caucasian 5 1.17 (0.88-1.57) 1.17 (0.88-1.57) 0.844
Asians 8 1.03 (0.88-1.21) 1.03 (0.87-1.21) 0.645
(A1A1 + A1A2) vs. A2A2 Total analysis 13 1.07 (0.96-1.21) 1.07 (0.98-1.18) 0.181
Caucasian 5 1.31 (1.01-1.69) 1.16 (1.02-1.33) 0.077
Asians 8 1.00 (0.88-1.13) 1.00 (0.88-1.13) 0.648

ORr: Odds ratio for random-effect model; ORf: Odds ratio for fixed-effect model; Ph: P value for heterogeneity test.