Table 3.
Between country contrasts of the associations between total self-reported exposure to SSB promotions and SSB consumption using multinomial logistic regression (n = 15,515, ref: no SSB consumption, only country estimates printed).
| Likelihood of SSB Consumption Compared with No Consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RRR | Low 95% CI | High 95% CI | |
| No SSB Consumption (n = 5265), ref | |||
| Low SSB Consumption (n = 5117) | |||
| Australia vs. UK | 1.40 | 1.21 | 1.62 |
| Canada vs. UK | 1.37 | 1.18 | 1.59 |
| USA vs. UK | 1.08 | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| Mexico vs. UK | 2.26 | 1.91 | 2.69 |
| Canada vs. Australia | 0.98 | 0.84 | 1.13 |
| USA vs. Australia | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.89 |
| Mexico vs. Australia | 1.62 | 1.36 | 1.93 |
| USA vs. Canada | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.87 |
| Mexico vs. Canada | 1.68 | 1.45 | 1.95 |
| Mexico vs. USA | 2.09 | 1.77 | 2.47 |
| High SSB consumption (n = 5133) | |||
| Australia vs. UK | 1.72 | 1.48 | 1.99 |
| Canada vs. UK | 0.96 | 0.81 | 1.13 |
| USA vs. UK | 1.12 | 0.96 | 1.30 |
| Mexico vs. UK | 4.33 | 3.65 | 5.14 |
| Canada vs. Australia | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.65 |
| USA vs. Australia | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.75 |
| Mexico vs. Australia | 2.52 | 2.13 | 2.99 |
| USA vs. Canada | 1.08 | 0.95 | 1.24 |
| Mexico vs. Canada | 4.40 | 3.78 | 5.13 |
| Mexico vs. USA | 3.88 | 3.30 | 4.56 |
Note: Relative risk ratio (RRR), confidence interval (CI), adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity, and education. Reference country presented second.