Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245021

Table 1.

Heart rate variability comparison between computer vs. board playing (n = 27).

Variable Board
Median (IQR)
Computer
Median (IQR)
p-Value Effect Size
MeanRR 706.98 (122.48) 777.86 (136.61) 0.055 −0.370
SDNN 49.45 (55.52) 48.98 (33.77) 0.456 −0.143
pNN50 18.21 (19.10) 17.92 (24.39) 0.387 −0.166
RMSSD 38.27 (22.91) 39.94 (32.34) 0.143 −0.282
HFn 39.19 (18.00) 38.24 (28.43) 0.456 −0.143
LFn 60.66 (17.95) 61.67 (28.44) 0.471 −0.139
LF/HF 1.55 (1.41) 1.61 (2.36) 0.829 −0.004
Total Power 2123.53 (2952.96) 1914.01 (2883.11) 0.471 −0.139
SD1 27.11 (16.24) 28.28 (22.90) 0.136 −0.287
SD2 65.30 (31.45) 59.04 (37.05) 0.239 −0.227
SampEn 1.64 (0.39) 1.59 (0.57) 0.792 −0.050

Effect size correspond to “r”. IQR: interquartile range; RR: time between RR intervals in milliseconds; SDNN: standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals; pNN50: the percentage of intervals >50 ms different from preceding interval; RMSSD: root mean square of successive RR interval differences; LF/HF: ratio low frequency (LFn) (ms2)/high frequency (HFn) (ms2); Total Power: the sum of all spectra; SD1: dispersion, standard deviation, of points perpendicular to the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SD2: dispersion, standard deviation, of points along the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SampEn: sample entropy.