Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245021

Table 2.

Heart rate variability comparison between computer vs. board playing in participants who are not familiarized playing with computer (n = 13).

Variable Board
Median (IQR)
Computer
Median (IQR)
p-Value Effect Size
MeanRR 696.63 (98.56) 767.55 (132.64) 0.075 −0.494
SDNN 50.28 (24.63) 49.16 (30.49) 0.701 −0.106
pNN50 19.58 (22.74) 25.98 (21.73) 0.249 −0.320
RMSSD 42.01 (24.34) 45.04 (39.40) 0.028 −0.610
HFn 41.82 (15.17) 47.24 (33.53) 0.249 −0.320
LFn 57.90 (14.94) 51.62 (33.58) 0.279 −0.307
LF/HF 1.38 (0.89) 1.09 (2.11) 0.807 −0.184
Total Power 2496.56 (2530.04) 1914.01 (3222.14) 0.471 −0.048
SD1 29.75 (17.23) 31.88 (27.90) 0.028 −0.610
SD2 65.91 (28.67) 62.63 (32.84) 0.507 −0.184
SampEn 1.64 (0.30) 1.64 (0.60) 0.807 −0.068

Effect size correspond to “r”. IQR: interquartile range; RR: time between RR intervals in milliseconds; SDNN: standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals; pNN50: the percentage of intervals >50 ms different from preceding interval; RMSSD: root mean square of successive RR interval differences; LF/HF: ratio low frequency (LFn) (ms2)/high frequency (HFn) (ms2); Total Power: the sum of all spectra; SD1: dispersion, standard deviation, of points perpendicular to the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SD2: dispersion, standard deviation, of points along the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SampEn: sample entropy.