Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245021

Table 3.

Heart rate variability comparison between computer vs. board playing in participants who are familiarized playing with computer (n = 14).

Variable Board
Mean (SD)
Computer
Mean (SD)
p-Value Effect Size
MeanRR 712.06 (196.64) 781.07 (179.92) 0.300 −0.286
SDNN 47.58 (32.67) 44.36 (32.62) 0.397 −0.235
pNN50 11.53 (25.03) 13.38 (26.67) 0.975 −0.008
RMSSD 36.00 (25.50) 36.48 (30.79) 0.975 −0.008
HFn 33.80 (22.12) 33.93 (27.71) 0.925 −0.026
LFn 66.19 (22.27) 66.01 (27.75) 0.875 −0.043
LF/HF 2.00 (2.14) 1.94 (2.69) 0.510 −0.182
Total Power 1658.37 (3206.29) 1774.21 (2319.68) 0.638 −0.130
SD1 25.49 (20.19) 25.85 (21.87) 0.975 −0.008
SD2 59.67 (42.78) 56.72 (41.39) 0.363 −0.252
SampEn 1.68 (0.62) 1.57 (0.60) 0.826 −0.061

Effect size correspond to “r”. IQR: interquartile range; RR: time between RR intervals in milliseconds; SDNN: standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals; pNN50: the percentage of intervals >50 ms different from preceding interval; RMSSD: root mean square of successive RR interval differences; LF/HF: ratio low frequency (LFn) (ms2)/high frequency (HFn) (ms2); Total Power: the sum of all spectra; SD1: dispersion, standard deviation, of points perpendicular to the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SD2: dispersion, standard deviation, of points along the axis of line-of-identity in the Poincaré plot; SampEn: sample entropy.