Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;11(12):2951. doi: 10.3390/nu11122951

Table 3.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model for nutrient label choices

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value p-Value
Country 2 1.9831 0.991554 15.22 0.000
Sex 1 0.0001 0.000095 0.00 0.970
Age 3 0.1052 0.035055 0.54 0.656
HAQ 2 0.6907 0.345329 5.30 0.005
FTNS 1 0.0275 0.027495 0.42 0.516
Income 3 0.3056 0.101861 1.56 0.197
Urban area 1 0.0063 0.006307 0.10 0.756
University 1 0.1661 0.166091 2.55 0.111
Country × Income 6 1.0368 0.172796 2.65 0.015
Sex × Age 3 0.5851 0.195020 2.99 0.030
HAQ × Urban area 2 0.7095 0.354760 5.45 0.005
FTNS × Income 3 0.6797 0.226572 3.48 0.016
FTNS × University 1 0.3869 0.386895 5.94 0.015
Error 535 34.8531 0.065146
Lack-of-Fit 367 28.0640 0.076469 1.89 0.000
Pure Error 168 6.7891 0.040411
Total 564 42.2876

HAQ: Health attitude score, from the Health and Taste Attitude Questionnaire [74]. FTNS: Food technology neophobia score, from the Food Technology Neophobia Scale (FTNS) [76]. DF: degrees of freedom; Adj SS: adjusted sum of squares; Adj MS: adjusted mean squares; F-value: the test statistic used to determine whether the term is associated with the response; p-value: a probability that measures the evidence against the null hypothesis (source: https://support.minitab.com/).