Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;11(12):2934. doi: 10.3390/nu11122934

Table 3.

CES-D(mean) and DASH(mean) total score as predictors of first follow-up and rate of change in BMI, overall and stratifying by sex, race and poverty status: multiple linear mixed-effects regression models, HANDLS 2004–2018 1.

Overall Men Women Whites African Americans Below Poverty Above Poverty
BMI (n = 1458; k = 1.8) (n = 592; k = 1.8) (n = 866; k = 1.8) (n = 579; k = 1.8) (n = 879; k = 1.8) (n = 596; k = 1.8) (n = 862; k = 1.8)
Model 1:
TIME +0.32 ± 0.15 * +0.29 ± 0.20 +0.51 ± 0.20 * +0.42 ± 0.18 +0.28 ± 0.39 +0.38 ± 0.23 +0.36 ± 0.34
CES-D(mean) +0.01 ± 0.02 −0.01 ± 0.03 +0.02 ± 0.03 −0.02 ± 0.03 +0.03 ± 0.03 −0.01 ± 0.03 +0.02 ± 0.03
CES-D(mean) × TIME +0.001 ± 0.003 −0.007 ± 0.004 +0.004 ± 0.003 +0.002 ± 0.003 +0.001 ± 0.003 +0.005 ± 0.004 −0.004 ± 0.003
DASH(mean) −0.55 ± 0.20 **,2 −0.13 ± 0.29 −0.75 ± 0.27 **,2 −0.94 ± 0.28 **,2 −0.05 ± 0.27 −0.96 ± 0.34 **,2 −0.27 ± 0.24
DASH(mean) × TIME −0.04 ± 0.02 −0.02 ± 0.03 −0.04 ± 0.03 −0.04 ± 0.03 −0.05 ± 0.03 −0.09 ± 0.04 *,2 −0.02 ± 0.02
Model 2:
TIME +0.31 ± 0.15 * +0.29 ± 0.20 +0.50 ± 0.20 * +0.42 ± 0.18 * +0.30 ± 0.39 +0.38 ± 0.23 +0.37 ± 0.34
CES-D(mean) +0.01 ± 0.02 −0.01 ± 0.03 2 +0.02 ± 0.03 −0.02 ± 0.03 +0.03 ± 0.03 −0.01 ± 0.03 +0.02 ± 0.03
CES-D (mean) × TIME +0.001 ± 0.003 −0.007 ± 0.004 2 +0.005 ± 0.003 +0.003 ± 0.003 +0.001 ± 0.003 +0.005 ± 0.004 2 −0.005 ± 0.003
Model 3:
TIME +0.32 ± 0.15 * +0.22 ± 0.20 +0.56 ± 0.19 ** +0.45 ± 0.18 * +0.29 ± 0.39 +0.44 ± 0.22 +0.32 ± 0.34
DASH(mean) −0.55 ± 0.20 **,2 −0.13 ± 0.29 −0.76 ± 0.27 **,2 −0.93 ± 0.28 **,2 −0.05 ± 0.27 −0.96 ± 0.34 ** −0.28 ± 0.24
DASH(mean) × TIME −0.04 ± 0.02 −0.02 ± 0.04 −0.04 ± 0.03 −0.04 ± 0.03 −0.05 ± 0.03 −0.09 ± 0.04 * −0.02 ± 0.02

Abbreviations: DASH = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; HANDLS = Healthy Aging in Neighborhood of Diversity across the Lifespan; SE = Standard Error; CES-D = The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. 1 Values are fixed effects regression coefficients from mixed-effects linear regression models (γ ± SE). Models were adjusted for visit 1 age, visit 2 age, sex, race, poverty status, educational attainment, literacy, employment status, current smoking status, current drug use, self-rated health, mean of total energy intake, and mean energy intake from grocery stores. 2 p < 0.05 for null hypothesis of no difference by sex, race, or poverty status based on two-way and three-way interaction terms with CES-D/DASH and TIME. First-visit age was centered at 48. Second-visit age was centered at 53. Energy intake was centered at 2027 kcal/d. Energy from stores centered at 1551 kcal/d. DASH(mean) was centered at 1.74. CES-D(mean) centered at 14.8. p < 0.05 for the null hypothesis of no difference by sex, race, or poverty status based on two-way and three-way interaction terms with CES-D/DASH and TIME.