Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;20:14. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7959-7

Table 4.

Socio-demographic, health and lifestyle correlates of higher-risk latent sexual health classes (Men)

Good Sexual Health Sexual Function Problems Wary Risk-takers Unwary Risk-takers
(n = 4112, 83.1% (n = 458, 8.8%) (n = 270, 3.8%) (n = 273, 4.3%)
% % Adjusted RRR % Adjusted RRR % Adjusted RRR
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
Stage (a) Sociodemographic factors
 Age 16–24 14.2 13.6 0.59 (0.41–0.85) 35.8 1.26 (0.85–1.87) 20.6 0.64 (0.43–0.95)
25–44 40.8 48.4 1 40 1 36 1
45–54 20.4 16.8 0.67 (0.43–1.03) 10.1 0.55 (0.26–1.17) 24.4 1.65 (1.03–2.63)
55–74 24.6 21.3 0.78 (0.54–1.14) 14.1 0.89 (0.49–1.62) 19 1.29 (0.80–2.08)
 Ethnicity White 88.4 87.3 1 75.2 1 89.2 1
Minority 11.6 12.7 1.31 (0.78–2.19) 24.8 2.60 (1.63–4.12) 10.8 0.94 (0.51–1.73)
 Low SES score 0 50 51 1 27.9 1 37 1
1 or 2 39 39.2 0.88 (0.65–1.20) 46 1.30 (0.82–2.06) 44.7 1.34 (0.93–1.95)
3 to 5 11 9.8 0.74 (0.46–1.19) 26.1 2.28 (1.33–3.91) 18.3 1.63 (1.00–2.65)
 Sexual identity Heterosexual/straight 98.1 94.5 1 85.4 1 97.4 1
Gay/bisexual/other 1.9 5.5 3.65 (1.97–6.76) 14.7 9.23 (4.17–20.47) 2.6 0.83 (0.24–2.83)
 Partner Married/cohabiting 75.8 69.1 1 31.7 1 42.2 1
Not cohabiting 11.2 14.8 1.76 (1.21–2.57) 16.3 2.83 (1.64–4.87) 25.9 5.18 (3.34–8.04)
No regular partner 13 16.1 1.61 (1.14–2.28) 52 7.29 (4.72–11.27) 32 5.49 (3.62–8.32)
Stage (b) Health and lifestyle factors
 Alcohol/drug abuse no 78.9 72.7 1 54.7 1 59.4 1
yes 21.1 27.3 1.41 (1.03–1.92) 45.3 2.18 (1.50–3.16) 40.6 2.22 (1.59–3.11)
 Depression no 93.2 79.5 1 86.8 1 86.7 1
yes 6.8 20.5 5.06 (3.41–7.51) 13.2 1.72 (1.04–2.85) 13.3 1.78 (1.10–2.87)
 Age at first sex 16+ years 73.6 73.6 1 56.9 1 50.5 1
< 16 years 26.4 26.4 1.00 (0.74–1.35) 43.1 1.73 (1.15–2.59) 49.5 2.59 (1.89–3.55)

At stage (a) RRRs mutually adjusted for all other socio-demographic factors, stage (b) RRRs adjusted for socio-demographic factors in stage (a), but not mutually adjusted for other health/lifestyle factors. Bold font highlights statistically significant difference (p < .05) from the reference group. Percentages and RRRs allow for complex survey design features

SES socio-economic status (score of lowest household income quintile, no educational qualifications, unemployed; highest area deprivation quintile). RRR relative risk ratio, CI confidence intervals where Good Sexual Health is the reference group