Table 2.
Preceptor.
| % (Frequency) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly Disagree | Moderately Disagree | Neutral | Moderately Agree | Strongly Agree | Not applicable | |
| Good direction and feedback were provided | 4.65 (2) |
– | 30.32 (13) |
11.63 (5) |
51.6 (22) |
2.33 (1) |
| This preceptor is interested in teaching this rotation | 2.33 (1) |
– | 23.26 (10) |
25.58 (11) |
48.84 (21) |
|
| This preceptor related to me as an individual | 6.98 (3) |
2.33 (1) |
25.58 (11) |
20.39 (9) |
37.21 (16) |
6.98 (3) |
| This preceptor encouraged students to actively participate in discussions and problem-solving exercises | 2.33 (1) |
4.65 (2) |
34.88 (15) |
20.93 (9) |
37.21 (16) |
– |
| This preceptor described their approach to thinking about therapeutic problems | 6.98 (3) |
– | 23.26 (10) |
30.23 (13) |
37.21 (16) |
2.33 (1) |
| This preceptor was readily available to answer questions and concerns | 2.33 (1) |
2.33 (1) |
9.30 (4) |
18.60 (8) |
67.44 (29) |
– |
| This preceptor is knowledgeable in their response to questions or their approach to therapy | 4.65 (2) |
– |
13.95 (6) |
23.26 (10) |
55.81 (24) |
2.33 (1) |
| This preceptor gave me a mid-point and final evaluation of my performance | 2.33 (1) |
– | 6.98 (3) |
34.88 (15) |
53.94 (23) |
2.33 (1) |
| This preceptor evaluated me at the end of the rotation in a manner which was helpful to me | 4.65 (2) |
– | 13.95 (6) |
23.26 (10) |
55.81 (24) |
2.33 (1) |
| This preceptor served as a role model for a pharmacist practicing in this practice setting | 2.33 (1) |
– | 18.60 (8) |
34.88 (15) |
39.53 (17) |
4.65 (2) |