Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;1(2):218–226. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy036

Table 3.

Note quality ratings by PQRI-9 domains, summary of domains, and overall note quality for 100 intervention and 100 control notes from the VGEENS trial

Intervention Control P-value Effect sizea z-score
Overall note quality 3.82 (3.67–3.98) 3.88 (3.71–4.04) .44 0.84 (0.55–1.30) −0.77
Up to date 3.47 (3.34–3.60) 3.48 (3.36–3.61) .72 0.93 (0.63–1.38) −0.36
Accurate 3.52 (3.39–3.64) 3.52 (3.39–3.66) .85 0.97 (0.69–1.35) −0.19
Thorough 4.04 (3.87–4.20) 3.89 (3.70–4.08) .86 0.93 (0.43–2.03) −0.18
Useful 4.14 (4.00–4.28) 4.16 (4.01–4.30) .77 0.93 (0.59–1.48) −0.29
Organized 4.03 (3.84–4.21) 4.10 (3.92–4.28) .63 0.89 (0.57–1.40) −0.49
Comprehensible 4.03 (3.86–4.20) 4.08 (3.90–4.25) .53 0.87 (0.56–1.35) −0.63
Succinct 3.71 (3.50–3.92) 4.17 (4.01–4.33) .38 0.73 (0.36–1.47) −0.88
Synthesized 4.23 (4.08–4.38) 4.06 (3.88–4.23) .28 1.29 (0.81–2.07) 1.07
Internally consistent 3.67 (3.53–3.81) 3.70 (3.55–3.85) .54 0.88 (0.59–1.32) −0.61
Sum of all axes 34.82 35.17 .64 Beta coefficient −0.35 (−1.84 to 1.14) −0.46

Note: 95% confidence interval appears in parentheses.

Abbreviation: VGEENS: Voice-Generated Enhanced Electronic Note System.

a

Effect sizes reported as odds ratios except as indicated.