Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;5(1):e00818-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00818-19

TABLE 1.

Functional distribution of PUUP-responding genesa

GO term PUUP data set frequency (%) Genome frequency (%) P value Genes annotated to the GO term
Upregulated genes
    Response to chemicals 28 8.88 2.22E−08 ECM4, FES1, FRM2, HAP4, HBN1, HSP104, HSP12, HSP31, IML2, MIG2, NQM1, NRG1, PDR15, PDR16, PDR3, PDR5, RPN4, SIS1, SNQ2, SSA1, SSA4, TDA1, TPO1, XBP1, YJL144W, YKL071W, YNL134C, YOR1
    Transmembrane transport 12 7.32 3.09E−02 BAP2, HXT5, MPC3, PDR15, PDR5, PMC1, PUG1, SNQ2, SSA1, SSA4, TPO1, YOR1
    Protein folding 10 1.75 9.52E−06 APJ1, BTN2, CUR1, HSP104, HSP26, HSP78, HSP82, SIS1, SSA1, SSA4
    Response to heat 8 1.4 7.51E−05 CUR1, HSP104, HSP12, HSP26, HSP78, HSP82, SSA1, SSA4
    Response to oxidative stress 8 1.91 5.59E−04 FRM2, HBN1, HSP104, HSP12, HSP31, NQM1, TDA1, XBP1
Downregulated genes
    Conjugation 25.71 1.91 9.74E−16 AFB1, AGA1, FAR1, FIG1, FIG2, FUS1, FUS2, FUS3, GPA1, KAR4, MF(ALPHA)1, MF(ALPHA)2, PRM1, PRM3, SAG1, SST2, STE2, STE3
    Response to chemical 20 8.88 2.01E−03 AFB1, AGA1, FAR1, FIG2, FUS3, GPA1, KAR4, MF(ALPHA)1, MF(ALPHA)2, SAG1, SAM3, SST2, STE2, STE3
    Transposition 12.86 1.77 3.73E−06 FUS3, TEC1, YAR010C, YBL005W-A, YDR365W-B, YJR027W, YOL103W-B, YPR137C-A, YPR158C-D
    Transmembrane transport 12.86 7.32 3.80E−02 FTR1, HXT4, HXT7, POR1, PRM6, SAM3, YCT1, ZRT1, ZRT2
    Signaling 11.43 5.62 2.60E−02 FUS2, FUS3, GPA1, MF(ALPHA)1, MF(ALPHA)2, SST2, STE2, STE3
    DNA recombination 8.57 3.93 3.71E−02 NDJ1, SHU1, YDR365W-B, YJR027W, YOL103W-B, YPR158C-D
a

Data (100 upregulated genes and 73 downregulated genes) were organized into Gene Ontology (GO)-based biological process categories using the GO Term Mapper tool (https://go.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/GOTermMapper). Significantly overrepresented categories (P ≤ 0.05) with a PUUP data set frequency of ≥8% are listed.