Fig. 5. Performance comparison between blind multi-view imaging and the smart rotation workflow.
a Comparison between the fused images from a blind multi-view approach and our smart rotation workflow. The difference image is calculated as the difference in information content between the smart rotation generated image and the blind multi-view generated image. Number denotes relative image coverage. b Sample coverage measured as a percentage of the maximum possible against the number of views used. c Angles selected by the smart rotation evaluation during a 16 h time-lapse of a zebrafish embryo (Tg(kdrl:GFP)). d Sample coverage percentage comparison between the smart rotation workflows and blind multi-view workflow over the 16 h time-lapse. S denotes smart rotation workflow and B denotes blind multi-view workflow and number denotes and number of view used.