Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 28;57(1):301–309. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04061-5

Table 4.

Cooking quality and firmness of pasta samples

Pasta sample Minimal cooking time Weight increase index ± SD Cooking loss ± SD Firmness ± SD
(min) (%) (N)
CON 7.5 2.61a ± 0.06 5.02f ± 0.13 3.32d ± 0.12
P5 7.5 2.46b ± 0.04 5.71e ± 0.14 4.15b ± 0.23
P10 8 2.46b ± 0.01 6.42d ± 0.03 4.13b ± 0.12
P15 8 2.48b ± 0.05 7.48b ± 0.22 4.05b ± 0.07
P20 8 2.49d ± 0.04 7.58b ± 0.11 2.86e ± 0.28
RL5 8 2.4b ± 0.07 6.63d ± 0.27 3.31d ± 0.12
RL10 8 2.32c ± 0.08 7.01c ± 0.18 3.16d ± 0.18
RL15 8 2.32c ± 0.05 6.98c ± 0.52 3.87c ± 0.20
RL20 8 2.44b ± 0.02 7.47b ± 0.04 5.02a ± 0.38
GP5 7.5 2.35c ± 0.03 5.25f ± 0.14 3.35d ± 0.20
GP10 8.5 2.24d ± 0.02 7.13c ± 0.45 1.93f ± 0.12
GP15 8.5 2.25d ± 0.03 7.46b ± 0.19 2.05f ± 0.08
GP20 8.5 2.24d ± 0.04 8.23a ± 0.28 2.00f ± 0.06

CON control sample (semolina durum pasta), P green pea flour, RL red lentil flour, GP grass pea flour, SD standard deviation for three determinations

The different letters (a–f) within the same column indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the results