Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 7;8(12):1592. doi: 10.3390/cells8121592

Table 2.

pIC-responsive miRNAs in the head kidney of fish fed the control diet identified by DESeq2 (n = 3) and confirmed by qPCR (n = 8–9).

miRNAs 1 Base Mean 2 Fold-Change 3 Adjusted p-Values 4 qPCR Fold-Change 5
Up-regulated by pIC
miR-27d-1-5p 6 868.11 2.17 0.049 2.69
miR-27d-2-5p 6 861.10 2.17 0.049 2.69
miR-30e-1-2-3p 404.73 2.16 0.049 2.57
miR-135bd-5p 52.80 14.03 0.036 1.54
miR-146a-5p 152066.51 1.71 0.028 1.62
miR-146a-1-2-3p 6322.03 7.94 3.85 × 10-4 7.89
miR-181a-5-3p 11080.58 1.59 0.051 1.97
miR-221-5p 221.52 4.44 0.036 7.55
miR-462a-3p 1554.09 2.69 0.098 5.72
miR-462b-3p 941.82 5.46 8.0 × 10-12 N/A
miR-8159-5p 97.72 9.92 0.055 N/A
Down-regulated by pIC
miR-106a-3p 960.11 −1.93 0.036 N/A

1 miRNAs with bold font are differentially expressed in both pIC and ASAL groups when compared to the PBS-injected control group. The mature sequences and miRBase identities of each miRNA are given in Supplemental Table S4. 2 The mean of normalized read counts for all of the samples included in the comparison. 3 Fold-change (pIC/PBS) was converted from the log2 fold-change (given by DESeq2 analyses). For the down-regulated miRNA, the fold-change value was inverted (−1/fold-change). 4 Adjusted p-values as determined by DESeq2 analyses. 5 For qPCR fold-change calculation (fish fed the control diet), overall fold up-regulation was calculated as 2A−B as in Xue et al. [46], where A was the mean of log2 RQ from the pIC group, and B was the mean of log2 RQ from PBS group. Underlined qPCR fold-change values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). N/A = not applicable. 6 miR-27d-2-5p and miR-27d-1-5p are identical except the length difference (24 vs. 23 nt). Therefore, the qPCR assay was generic to both miRNAs.