Sciscione 1999.
Methods | RCT. Computer‐generated allocation sequence. Concealment of allocation by opaque, sealed, consecutively‐numbered envelopes. | |
Participants | Singleton vertex pregnancies with intact membranes, BS < 6. Term > 28 weeks. Inclusion of women with previous CS. | |
Interventions | Intracervical PGE2 (0.5 mg) every 6 hours (72 women). Intracervical Foley catheter inflated with 30 mL (77 women). | |
Outcomes | Spontaneous onset of labour, nausea, maternal discomfort measured with an analogue scale 0‐10, non‐reassuring FHR, hyperstimulation, use of epidural, use of oxytocin, shoulder dystocia, vaginal delivery. | |
Notes | 12 women excluded (6 women in PGE2 group because of use of Foley catheter, 2 removed consent, 1 pre‐eclampsia, 1 BS of 7 and 2 breech). Setting: Medical centre of Delaware, USA. tertiary referral centre, Study period: July 1995 to July 1996 Funding: not reported Declarations of interest: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random allocation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed, opaque envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not feasible due to nature of intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No ITT, women excluded because of protocol violation. no missing data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All pre‐specified outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias detected |