Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 18;2019(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3

Sciscione 1999.

Methods RCT. Computer‐generated allocation sequence. Concealment of allocation by opaque, sealed, consecutively‐numbered envelopes.
Participants Singleton vertex pregnancies with intact membranes, BS < 6. Term > 28 weeks. Inclusion of women with previous CS.
Interventions Intracervical PGE2 (0.5 mg) every 6 hours (72 women).
 Intracervical Foley catheter inflated with 30 mL (77 women).
Outcomes Spontaneous onset of labour, nausea, maternal discomfort measured with an analogue scale 0‐10, non‐reassuring FHR, hyperstimulation, use of epidural, use of oxytocin, shoulder dystocia, vaginal delivery.
Notes 12 women excluded (6 women in PGE2 group because of use of Foley catheter, 2 removed consent, 1 pre‐eclampsia, 1 BS of 7 and 2 breech).
Setting: Medical centre of Delaware, USA. tertiary referral centre,
Study period: July 1995 to July 1996
Funding: not reported
Declarations of interest: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random allocation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed, opaque envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not feasible due to nature of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No ITT, women excluded because of protocol violation. no missing data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk No other bias detected